H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jan Gunnarsson vs Tomas Smid H2H: 1-3
Tomas Smid holds a 3–1 lead over Jan Gunnarsson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tomas Smid leads 1–0 on carpet, while Jan Gunnarsson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jan Gunnarsson won the 1988 Geneva third round 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 64
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 1988* | Geneva | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jan Gunnarsson | 7-6 6-4 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
| Mar 15, 1988* | Key Biscayne | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Tomas Smid | 6-4 6-0 6-3 | Jan Gunnarsson | Match data |
| Jun 27, 1986* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Tomas Smid | 6-7 6-4 6-3 6-4 | Jan Gunnarsson | Match data |
| Mar 20, 1986* | Brussels | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Tomas Smid | 6-1 7-6 | Jan Gunnarsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Gunnarsson | #774 | #25 | 579 | 1,822 | 190 | 203 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan Gunnarsson | Tomas Smid | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #389 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1980 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #274 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1981 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1982 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #99 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #48 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1985 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1987 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #39 | 1,751 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1988 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #84 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1989 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1990 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #99 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 1991 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #94 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1992 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #296 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #511 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 |