Jan Hernych
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lleyton Hewitt | 0 | 7 | 7 | Jul 13, 2013 | H2H |
| Nikolay Davydenko | 2 | 5 | 7 | Sep 3, 2009 | H2H |
| Mario Ancic | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 7, 2009 | H2H |
| Novak Djokovic | 1 | 3 | 4 | Nov 6, 2009 | H2H |
| Gael Monfils | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 14, 2013 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC
Eduardo Schwank holds a 1–0 lead over Jan Hernych in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Eduardo Schwank leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Eduardo Schwank won the 2008 Stuttgart Open quarterfinal 6-0 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eduardo Schwank | 6-0 4-6 6-3 | Jan Hernych | Match data | Jul 12, 2008* | QF | Stuttgart Open | International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Hernych | #1,606 | #59 | 1,157 | 1,783 | 79 | 115 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Eduardo Schwank | #1,858 | #48 | 1,380 | 1,741 | 37 | 61 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan Hernych | Eduardo Schwank | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #118 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #74 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #74 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #75 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #216 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #156 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #113 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #168 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #193 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2013 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2015 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #424 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jan Hernych | Eduardo Schwank | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 20 | 2000 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2002 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2004 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2010 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2005 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2011 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2006 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2012 | — | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2007 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2008 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2010 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2012 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2013 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2014 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2015 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2016 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 43 | 59 | 102 | 42.2% | 13 | 28 | 41 | 31.7% | 19 | 21 | 40 | 47.5% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | — | 8 | 20 | 28 | 28.6% | 28 | 34 | 62 | 45.2% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 190/194 of Jan Hernych's and 98/98 of Eduardo Schwank's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jan Hernych | Eduardo Schwank | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 20 | 2000 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 72.7% | 55.0% | 33.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 49.1% | 25.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 64.8% | 42.9% | 47.4% | 44.4% | 100.0% | 44.4% | 32.6% |
| 22 | 2002 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 63.4% | 38.5% | 20.0% | 40.0% | 50.0% | 31.7% | 33.3% | 2008 | 30/30 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 63.6% | 70.4% | 51.7% | 68.0% | 43.3% | 63.6% | 36.2% |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 17/17 | 3.1 | 3.9 | 57.7% | 61.2% | 46.1% | 45.4% | 33.9% | 54.3% | 33.6% |
| 24 | 2004 | 21/21 | 3.1 | 2.0 | 65.6% | 66.1% | 49.3% | 55.9% | 49.3% | 60.3% | 37.7% | 2010 | 33/33 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 61.7% | 68.2% | 49.9% | 45.0% | 36.8% | 61.3% | 34.9% |
| 25 | 2005 | 39/40 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 65.8% | 64.8% | 50.9% | 59.0% | 44.9% | 60.0% | 38.0% | 2011 | 9/9 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 63.4% | 67.0% | 58.0% | 50.9% | 45.9% | 63.8% | 32.5% |
| 26 | 2006 | 36/37 | 2.7 | 1.7 | 66.8% | 64.4% | 51.4% | 55.2% | 44.3% | 60.0% | 40.1% | 2012 | 8/8 | 4.3 | 2.3 | 67.5% | 68.0% | 56.5% | 52.6% | 46.9% | 64.2% | 37.9% |
| 27 | 2007 | 21/22 | 3.1 | 1.6 | 66.2% | 64.5% | 49.4% | 54.9% | 36.1% | 59.1% | 36.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2008 | 12/12 | 2.2 | 2.6 | 65.3% | 59.8% | 51.0% | 45.2% | 47.7% | 56.8% | 35.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 34/34 | 3.0 | 2.4 | 65.0% | 66.1% | 48.1% | 59.0% | 39.0% | 59.7% | 35.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2010 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 61.2% | 58.7% | 65.0% | 33.3% | 33.3% | 61.2% | 33.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 5/5 | 5.0 | 2.2 | 68.7% | 64.0% | 51.8% | 77.2% | 32.9% | 60.3% | 36.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2012 | 3/3 | 2.3 | 4.0 | 56.3% | 58.6% | 47.0% | 64.9% | 33.3% | 53.2% | 39.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2013 | 10/10 | 4.3 | 3.2 | 61.1% | 67.6% | 51.5% | 54.1% | 34.9% | 61.4% | 34.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2014 | 2/2 | 12.0 | 1.5 | 69.2% | 71.4% | 45.7% | 66.2% | 35.0% | 63.4% | 34.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2015 | 3/4 | 4.3 | 2.7 | 66.4% | 60.1% | 51.5% | 63.1% | 43.3% | 57.2% | 36.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2016 | 1/1 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 62.9% | 67.9% | 36.4% | 55.6% | 40.0% | 56.2% | 34.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 190/194 | 3.0 | 2.2 | 65.6% | 64.6% | 49.8% | 56.5% | 42.0% | 59.4% | 37.2% | — | 98/98 | 3.8 | 3.1 | 62.3% | 67.3% | 51.0% | 53.3% | 40.6% | 61.1% | 35.1% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jan Hernych | Eduardo Schwank | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 20 | 2000 | 1486 | 98.6 | -2.51 | +0.58 | 0.491 | 38.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2001 | 1474 | 101.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1530 | 102.1 | -1.83 | -1.86 | 0.586 | 39.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.14 |
| 22 | 2002 | 1476 | 96.0 | -0.28 | -1.50 | 0.488 | 32.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | +0.02 | 2008 | 1705 | 135.0 | +0.30 | -0.16 | 0.996 | 50.1% | -118 | +77 | -155 | 47.4% | +0.13 | 6–5 (55%) | 5–10 (33%) | — | -0.42 |
| 23 | 2003 | 1461 | 99.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1574 | 112.7 | -5.72 | -2.82 | 0.735 | 44.5% | -9 | +102 | -73 | 23.3% | -1.95 | 2–4 (33%) | 5–2 (71%) | — | +0.84 |
| 24 | 2004 | 1572 | 131.6 | -2.45 | +1.84 | 0.949 | 49.1% | +5 | — | -15 | 40.4% | -0.57 | 3–4 (43%) | 2–4 (33%) | — | -0.25 | 2010 | 1594 | 132.3 | -1.26 | -1.90 | 0.901 | 47.8% | -53 | +122 | — | 39.7% | -1.00 | 1–5 (17%) | 9–3 (75%) | — | +0.43 |
| 25 | 2005 | 1623 | 129.5 | -1.47 | +0.65 | 0.949 | 49.0% | -58 | -65 | +45 | 46.2% | -0.34 | 5–7 (42%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | -0.80 | 2011 | 1588 | 117.4 | +0.98 | -2.80 | 0.898 | 48.4% | -54 | +100 | — | 35.0% | -0.60 | 0–2 | 3–4 (43%) | — | -0.03 |
| 26 | 2006 | 1667 | 130.1 | -1.41 | +2.15 | 1.001 | 50.0% | -66 | -121 | +41 | 47.3% | -0.29 | 3–7 (30%) | 7–4 (64%) | — | -0.14 | 2012 | 1673 | 119.1 | +0.19 | +1.41 | 1.060 | 50.5% | — | +49 | — | 50.0% | +0.05 | 1–1 | 3–2 (60%) | — | -0.39 |
| 27 | 2007 | 1613 | 131.4 | -1.99 | +0.62 | 0.893 | 47.8% | +23 | -116 | — | 36.0% | -1.02 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–5 (17%) | — | -1.47 | 2013 | 1625 | 92.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2008 | 1676 | 117.5 | -2.03 | -0.68 | 0.813 | 46.8% | +19 | -154 | — | 37.5% | -1.06 | 2–3 (40%) | 4–2 (67%) | — | +0.14 | 2014 | 1591 | 99.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 1668 | 137.6 | -2.02 | -0.08 | 0.888 | 47.8% | +35 | -129 | +32 | 35.6% | -0.80 | 5–9 (36%) | 2–6 (25%) | — | -1.77 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2010 | 1598 | 112.4 | -0.83 | +1.60 | 0.867 | 47.8% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 1664 | 121.9 | -0.09 | +1.05 | 0.929 | 48.7% | +47 | — | — | 47.1% | +0.06 | 2–0 | 1–4 (20%) | — | -0.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2012 | 1606 | 112.1 | -2.89 | +0.24 | 0.845 | 46.8% | — | +54 | — | 50.0% | -0.75 | 2–0 | — | — | -0.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2013 | 1745 | 122.3 | -0.81 | -0.62 | 0.905 | 48.3% | — | — | +148 | 45.8% | -0.46 | 3–1 (75%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | -0.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2014 | 1702 | 109.1 | +1.00 | -1.06 | 0.949 | 49.7% | — | — | — | 44.4% | -0.33 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2015 | 1696 | 112.0 | -2.26 | -1.93 | 0.853 | 47.2% | — | — | +192 | 50.0% | -0.63 | 1–0 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2016 | 1641 | 101.2 | +0.27 | -3.38 | 0.789 | 45.9% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2018 | 1618 | 97.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1783 | 128.6 | -1.68 | +0.70 | 0.918 | 48.5% | -12 | -100 | +78 | 41.9% | -0.60 | 28–37 (43%) | 32–37 (46%) | 95.5 | -2.56 | — | 1741 | 127.6 | -1.24 | -1.34 | 0.901 | 48.1% | -68 | +95 | -114 | 39.5% | -0.69 | 10–17 (37%) | 25–21 (54%) | 101.4 | +0.58 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lleyton Hewitt | 0 | 7 | 7 | Jul 13, 2013 | H2H |
| Nikolay Davydenko | 2 | 5 | 7 | Sep 3, 2009 | H2H |
| Mario Ancic | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 7, 2009 | H2H |
| Novak Djokovic | 1 | 3 | 4 | Nov 6, 2009 | H2H |
| Gael Monfils | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 14, 2013 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Ignacio Chela | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 23, 2011 | H2H |
| Igor Andreev | 2 | 1 | 3 | Feb 17, 2011 | H2H |
| Nicolas Almagro | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 27, 2010 | H2H |
| Jarkko Nieminen | 0 | 2 | 2 | Apr 26, 2012 | H2H |
| Lukasz Kubot | 0 | 2 | 2 | Feb 24, 2011 | H2H |