H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Jan Hernych vs Hugo Armando H2H: 1-0

Jan Hernych holds a 1–0 lead over Hugo Armando in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan Hernych leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jan Hernych won the 2005 Swiss Open Gstaad round of 32 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jan Hernych
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Hugo Armando
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jan Hernych #60 7-5 6-3 Hugo Armando #166 Match data Jul 7, 2005* R32 Swiss Open Gstaad ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jan Hernych #1,606 #59 1,157 1,783 79 115 40.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hugo Armando #1,126 #100 403 1,581 13 30 30.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jan Hernych Hugo Armando
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2000 0–1 0.0% #272 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2002 0–1 0.0% #214 1,475 0 0 2000 0–2 0.0% #167 1,473 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2001 4–6 40.0% #123 1,517 0 0
24 2004 9–12 42.9% #83 1,571 0 0 2002 0–2 0.0% #428 1,498 0 0
25 2005 18–22 45.0% #74 1,622 0 0 2003 0–5 0.0% #254 1,441 0 0
26 2006 17–20 45.9% #75 1,666 0 0 2004 4–3 57.1% #161 1,508 0 0
27 2007 7–15 31.8% #156 1,612 0 0 2005 1–5 16.7% #178 1,520 0 0
28 2008 4–8 33.3% #81 1,675 0 0 2006 1–3 25.0% #203 1,478 0 0
29 2009 11–23 32.4% #113 1,667 0 0 2007 2–3 40.0% #227 1,574 0 0
30 2010 0–1 0.0% #241 1,598 0 0 2008 1–1 50.0% #458 1,546 0 0
31 2011 3–2 60.0% #168 1,664 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2012 2–1 66.7% #193 1,606 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2013 5–5 50.0% #219 1,744 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2014 1–1 50.0% #199 1,701 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2015 2–2 50.0% #286 1,696 0 0 — — — — — — —
36 2016 0–1 0.0% #424 1,641 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jan Hernych Hugo Armando
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2002 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — —
24 2004 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2002 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2005 9 12 21 42.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2003 — — — — 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2006 6 9 15 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 2004 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2007 6 10 16 37.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2008 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2009 9 13 22 40.9% 2 7 9 22.2% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2007 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2011 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2012 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2014 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2016 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 43 59 102 42.2% 13 28 41 31.7% 19 21 40 47.5% 4 7 11 36.4% — 2 3 5 40.0% 11 27 38 28.9% — — — — — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 190/194 of Jan Hernych's and 42/43 of Hugo Armando's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jan Hernych Hugo Armando
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2000 1/1 1.0 1.0 72.7% 55.0% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 49.1% 25.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2002 1/1 0.0 1.0 63.4% 38.5% 20.0% 40.0% 50.0% 31.7% 33.3% 2000 2/2 1.0 2.5 61.7% 54.3% 51.6% 33.3% 33.3% 52.4% 38.5%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 9/10 5.0 3.2 59.1% 69.9% 51.9% 61.5% 28.7% 62.6% 39.3%
24 2004 21/21 3.1 2.0 65.6% 66.1% 49.3% 55.9% 49.3% 60.3% 37.7% 2002 2/2 1.5 2.5 57.5% 74.7% 62.8% 50.0% 10.0% 68.3% 31.5%
25 2005 39/40 2.5 2.3 65.8% 64.8% 50.9% 59.0% 44.9% 60.0% 38.0% 2003 5/5 2.0 2.0 66.5% 64.6% 49.8% 54.3% 20.7% 58.8% 32.2%
26 2006 36/37 2.7 1.7 66.8% 64.4% 51.4% 55.2% 44.3% 60.0% 40.1% 2004 7/7 4.0 2.4 60.8% 72.5% 55.5% 38.0% 35.4% 65.4% 34.3%
27 2007 21/22 3.1 1.6 66.2% 64.5% 49.4% 54.9% 36.1% 59.1% 36.5% 2005 6/6 2.3 1.8 57.5% 64.9% 42.8% 56.0% 19.4% 55.7% 33.2%
28 2008 12/12 2.2 2.6 65.3% 59.8% 51.0% 45.2% 47.7% 56.8% 35.1% 2006 4/4 3.0 2.0 65.3% 71.3% 52.0% 63.7% 33.3% 64.3% 31.8%
29 2009 34/34 3.0 2.4 65.0% 66.1% 48.1% 59.0% 39.0% 59.7% 35.8% 2007 5/5 1.2 2.4 61.5% 68.7% 51.1% 65.0% 51.3% 62.3% 43.0%
30 2010 1/1 2.0 2.0 61.2% 58.7% 65.0% 33.3% 33.3% 61.2% 33.7% 2008 2/2 1.0 3.0 65.0% 56.9% 50.4% 48.7% 35.6% 54.6% 40.6%
31 2011 5/5 5.0 2.2 68.7% 64.0% 51.8% 77.2% 32.9% 60.3% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2012 3/3 2.3 4.0 56.3% 58.6% 47.0% 64.9% 33.3% 53.2% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 10/10 4.3 3.2 61.1% 67.6% 51.5% 54.1% 34.9% 61.4% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2014 2/2 12.0 1.5 69.2% 71.4% 45.7% 66.2% 35.0% 63.4% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 3/4 4.3 2.7 66.4% 60.1% 51.5% 63.1% 43.3% 57.2% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2016 1/1 6.0 2.0 62.9% 67.9% 36.4% 55.6% 40.0% 56.2% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 190/194 3.0 2.2 65.6% 64.6% 49.8% 56.5% 42.0% 59.4% 37.2% — 42/43 2.9 2.5 61.2% 67.9% 51.3% 54.1% 30.3% 61.1% 36.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jan Hernych Hugo Armando
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 2000 1486 98.6 -2.51 +0.58 0.491 38.4% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2001 1474 101.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2002 1476 96.0 -0.28 -1.50 0.488 32.5% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.02 2000 1474 93.5 -2.19 -1.64 0.810 45.4% — — — 0.0% -2.25 — 0–1 — +0.20
23 2003 1461 99.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1517 114.5 -0.88 +0.41 1.052 50.5% — 0 — 40.9% -0.23 0–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.09
24 2004 1572 131.6 -2.45 +1.84 0.949 49.1% +5 — -15 40.4% -0.57 3–4 (43%) 2–4 (33%) 99.9 -0.25 2002 1499 104.8 -1.06 -2.13 0.993 48.4% — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 1–1 — -0.02
25 2005 1623 129.5 -1.47 +0.65 0.949 49.0% -58 -65 +45 46.2% -0.34 5–7 (42%) 9–8 (53%) 101.9 -0.80 2003 1442 95.7 -1.37 -2.81 0.780 45.9% — -14 — 16.7% -1.92 0–2 1–0 — +0.40
26 2006 1667 130.1 -1.41 +2.15 1.001 50.0% -66 -121 +41 47.3% -0.29 3–7 (30%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -0.14 2004 1508 120.2 +1.28 -0.74 0.990 50.5% +51 -32 — 58.8% +0.29 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — 0.00
27 2007 1613 131.4 -1.99 +0.62 0.893 47.8% +23 -116 — 36.0% -1.02 1–4 (20%) 1–5 (17%) 94.0 -1.47 2005 1520 114.8 -1.01 -3.09 0.748 44.4% — -41 — 26.7% -1.33 0–1 0–1 — -0.49
28 2008 1676 117.5 -2.03 -0.68 0.813 46.8% +19 -154 — 37.5% -1.06 2–3 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 99.3 +0.14 2006 1479 106.8 +0.97 -1.06 0.892 48.3% — -26 — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — -0.25
29 2009 1668 137.6 -2.02 -0.08 0.888 47.8% +35 -129 +32 35.6% -0.80 5–9 (36%) 2–6 (25%) 94.6 -1.77 2007 1574 109.1 +0.50 -0.77 1.141 53.1% — +11 — 40.0% +0.20 — 0–1 — +0.03
30 2010 1598 112.4 -0.83 +1.60 0.867 47.8% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — -0.05 2008 1547 96.3 -1.26 -1.18 0.894 47.3% — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — -0.04
31 2011 1664 121.9 -0.09 +1.05 0.929 48.7% +47 — — 47.1% +0.06 2–0 1–4 (20%) — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2012 1606 112.1 -2.89 +0.24 0.845 46.8% — +54 — 50.0% -0.75 2–0 — — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 1745 122.3 -0.81 -0.62 0.905 48.3% — — +148 45.8% -0.46 3–1 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 102.6 -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2014 1702 109.1 +1.00 -1.06 0.949 49.7% — — — 44.4% -0.33 1–0 0–1 — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 1696 112.0 -2.26 -1.93 0.853 47.2% — — +192 50.0% -0.63 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2016 1641 101.2 +0.27 -3.38 0.789 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2018 1618 97.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1783 128.6 -1.68 +0.70 0.918 48.5% -12 -100 +78 41.9% -0.60 28–37 (43%) 32–37 (46%) 95.5 -2.56 — 1582 111.8 -0.35 -1.24 0.930 48.7% +51 -14 — 35.4% -0.68 2–8 (20%) 6–9 (40%) 94.9 -0.60

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.