H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Jan Hernych vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 1-0

Jan Hernych holds a 1–0 lead over Hyung-Taik Lee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan Hernych leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jan Hernych won the 2006 Libéma Open quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jan Hernych
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Hyung-Taik Lee
KOR Age 50 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jan Hernych #128 6-4 6-4 Hyung-Taik Lee #109 Match data Jun 24, 2006* QF Libéma Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jan Hernych #1,606 #59 1,157 1,783 79 115 40.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hyung-Taik Lee #1,256 #36 864 1,798 121 156 43.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jan Hernych Hyung-Taik Lee
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 1995 1–1 50.0% #241 1,509 0 0
20 2000 0–1 0.0% #272 1,485 0 0 1996 0–1 0.0% #283 1,497 0 0
22 2002 0–1 0.0% #214 1,475 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — 1999 1–2 33.3% #191 1,497 0 0
24 2004 9–12 42.9% #83 1,571 0 0 2000 7–5 58.3% #90 1,642 0 0
25 2005 18–22 45.0% #74 1,622 0 0 2001 9–19 32.1% #116 1,559 0 0
26 2006 17–20 45.9% #75 1,666 0 0 2002 11–14 44.0% #87 1,625 0 0
27 2007 7–15 31.8% #156 1,612 0 0 2003 18–23 43.9% #56 1,606 0 1
28 2008 4–8 33.3% #81 1,675 0 0 2004 16–16 50.0% #59 1,693 0 1
29 2009 11–23 32.4% #113 1,667 0 0 2005 10–19 34.5% #107 1,625 0 1
30 2010 0–1 0.0% #241 1,598 0 0 2006 18–15 54.5% #49 1,736 0 1
31 2011 3–2 60.0% #168 1,664 0 0 2007 21–23 47.7% #51 1,769 0 1
32 2012 2–1 66.7% #193 1,606 0 0 2008 9–17 34.6% #107 1,611 0 1
33 2013 5–5 50.0% #219 1,744 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #871 1,580 0 1
34 2014 1–1 50.0% #199 1,701 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2015 2–2 50.0% #286 1,696 0 0 — — — — — — —
36 2016 0–1 0.0% #424 1,641 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jan Hernych Hyung-Taik Lee
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2002 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2004 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2000 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2005 9 12 21 42.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2001 3 14 17 17.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2006 6 9 15 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 2002 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
27 2007 6 10 16 37.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2008 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
29 2009 9 13 22 40.9% 2 7 9 22.2% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2005 5 11 16 31.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 14 11 25 56.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2011 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2007 15 15 30 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
32 2012 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2008 6 10 16 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
33 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2014 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2016 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 43 59 102 42.2% 13 28 41 31.7% 19 21 40 47.5% 4 7 11 36.4% — 84 107 191 44.0% 20 27 47 42.6% 17 19 36 47.2% 0 3 3 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 190/194 of Jan Hernych's and 199/206 of Hyung-Taik Lee's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jan Hernych Hyung-Taik Lee
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2000 1/1 1.0 1.0 72.7% 55.0% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 49.1% 25.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2002 1/1 0.0 1.0 63.4% 38.5% 20.0% 40.0% 50.0% 31.7% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2004 21/21 3.1 2.0 65.6% 66.1% 49.3% 55.9% 49.3% 60.3% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2005 39/40 2.5 2.3 65.8% 64.8% 50.9% 59.0% 44.9% 60.0% 38.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2006 36/37 2.7 1.7 66.8% 64.4% 51.4% 55.2% 44.3% 60.0% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2007 21/22 3.1 1.6 66.2% 64.5% 49.4% 54.9% 36.1% 59.1% 36.5% 2003 40/41 3.5 2.0 63.5% 68.1% 51.1% 53.0% 35.7% 62.0% 38.2%
28 2008 12/12 2.2 2.6 65.3% 59.8% 51.0% 45.2% 47.7% 56.8% 35.1% 2004 29/32 3.4 2.3 64.4% 69.4% 52.1% 53.8% 44.6% 63.6% 36.2%
29 2009 34/34 3.0 2.4 65.0% 66.1% 48.1% 59.0% 39.0% 59.7% 35.8% 2005 28/29 3.4 2.3 61.0% 68.0% 51.0% 54.1% 37.2% 61.8% 34.9%
30 2010 1/1 2.0 2.0 61.2% 58.7% 65.0% 33.3% 33.3% 61.2% 33.7% 2006 32/33 3.7 1.6 66.9% 68.9% 52.8% 60.1% 48.4% 63.9% 37.4%
31 2011 5/5 5.0 2.2 68.7% 64.0% 51.8% 77.2% 32.9% 60.3% 36.9% 2007 44/44 3.0 1.6 63.0% 70.3% 52.7% 53.0% 31.2% 64.0% 37.1%
32 2012 3/3 2.3 4.0 56.3% 58.6% 47.0% 64.9% 33.3% 53.2% 39.5% 2008 25/26 2.8 2.5 63.8% 65.5% 48.3% 52.8% 39.7% 59.3% 36.6%
33 2013 10/10 4.3 3.2 61.1% 67.6% 51.5% 54.1% 34.9% 61.4% 34.9% 2009 1/1 0.0 3.0 55.6% 60.0% 50.0% 63.6% 33.3% 55.6% 37.8%
34 2014 2/2 12.0 1.5 69.2% 71.4% 45.7% 66.2% 35.0% 63.4% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 3/4 4.3 2.7 66.4% 60.1% 51.5% 63.1% 43.3% 57.2% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2016 1/1 6.0 2.0 62.9% 67.9% 36.4% 55.6% 40.0% 56.2% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 190/194 3.0 2.2 65.6% 64.6% 49.8% 56.5% 42.0% 59.4% 37.2% — 199/277 3.3 2.0 63.7% 68.6% 51.5% 54.4% 38.7% 62.6% 36.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jan Hernych Hyung-Taik Lee
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1510 105.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–0 — +0.15
20 2000 1486 98.6 -2.51 +0.58 0.491 38.4% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.16 1996 1497 100.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.10
21 2001 1474 101.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2002 1476 96.0 -0.28 -1.50 0.488 32.5% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2003 1461 99.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1498 110.3 — — — — — — — 37.5% 0.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.19
24 2004 1572 131.6 -2.45 +1.84 0.949 49.1% +5 — -15 40.4% -0.57 3–4 (43%) 2–4 (33%) 99.9 -0.25 2000 1643 126.3 — — — — +16 — — 55.2% +0.38 0–1 4–2 (67%) — +0.44
25 2005 1623 129.5 -1.47 +0.65 0.949 49.0% -58 -65 +45 46.2% -0.34 5–7 (42%) 9–8 (53%) 101.9 -0.80 2001 1560 126.2 — — — — -10 +45 — 37.1% -0.71 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 100.8 -0.31
26 2006 1667 130.1 -1.41 +2.15 1.001 50.0% -66 -121 +41 47.3% -0.29 3–7 (30%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -0.14 2002 1626 130.4 — — — — -62 -53 +45 47.8% -0.10 3–6 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 99.5 -0.15
27 2007 1613 131.4 -1.99 +0.62 0.893 47.8% +23 -116 — 36.0% -1.02 1–4 (20%) 1–5 (17%) 94.0 -1.47 2003 1607 137.1 +0.37 +1.31 1.005 49.8% +38 -41 -12 43.6% -0.18 6–7 (46%) 5–12 (29%) 95.9 -1.24
28 2008 1676 117.5 -2.03 -0.68 0.813 46.8% +19 -154 — 37.5% -1.06 2–3 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 99.3 +0.14 2004 1694 132.8 0.00 +0.22 0.996 50.1% -22 -76 +2 51.3% -0.10 5–8 (38%) 7–6 (54%) 99.5 -0.09
29 2009 1668 137.6 -2.02 -0.08 0.888 47.8% +35 -129 +32 35.6% -0.80 5–9 (36%) 2–6 (25%) 94.6 -1.77 2005 1626 129.9 -0.24 -0.93 0.913 48.4% -33 +14 +61 39.7% -0.74 3–6 (33%) 3–7 (30%) 94.6 -1.85
30 2010 1598 112.4 -0.83 +1.60 0.867 47.8% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — -0.05 2006 1737 133.5 +1.59 +0.54 1.037 50.7% -41 — -11 52.3% +0.01 8–4 (67%) 10–5 (67%) 110.0 -0.52
31 2011 1664 121.9 -0.09 +1.05 0.929 48.7% +47 — — 47.1% +0.06 2–0 1–4 (20%) — -0.39 2007 1770 137.1 +0.81 +0.33 1.029 50.3% +8 -188 -69 47.7% -0.11 5–7 (42%) 9–14 (39%) 97.7 +0.89
32 2012 1606 112.1 -2.89 +0.24 0.845 46.8% — +54 — 50.0% -0.75 2–0 — — -0.23 2008 1611 130.0 -2.82 -0.10 0.900 48.3% +78 -31 — 43.8% -0.59 3–5 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 98.7 +0.14
33 2013 1745 122.3 -0.81 -0.62 0.905 48.3% — — +148 45.8% -0.46 3–1 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 102.6 -0.30 2009 1580 100.2 -0.70 -4.74 0.851 47.1% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.05
34 2014 1702 109.1 +1.00 -1.06 0.949 49.7% — — — 44.4% -0.33 1–0 0–1 — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 1696 112.0 -2.26 -1.93 0.853 47.2% — — +192 50.0% -0.63 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2016 1641 101.2 +0.27 -3.38 0.789 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2018 1618 97.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1783 128.6 -1.68 +0.70 0.918 48.5% -12 -100 +78 41.9% -0.60 28–37 (43%) 32–37 (46%) 95.5 -2.56 — 1799 138.7 +0.12 +0.29 0.985 49.7% -2 -43 +2 45.8% -0.27 37–52 (42%) 54–58 (48%) 99.2 -0.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.