H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jan Hernych vs Wayne Arthurs H2H: 1-0
Jan Hernych holds a 1–0 lead over Wayne Arthurs in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan Hernych leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jan Hernych won the 2006 St. Petersburg fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 55
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2006* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Jan Hernych | 6-4 6-4 | Wayne Arthurs | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Hernych | #1,606 | #59 | 1,157 | 1,780 | 79 | 115 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Wayne Arthurs | #368 | #44 | 833 | 1,781 | 122 | 152 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan Hernych | Wayne Arthurs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2004 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2005 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #74 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #561 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2007 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #156 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #187 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #105 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2009 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #113 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #83 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #77 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #168 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #52 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #193 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2013 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | 2015 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #161 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #424 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #244 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |