H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jan Kodes vs Antonio Zugarelli H2H: 1-2
Antonio Zugarelli holds a 2–1 lead over Jan Kodes in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Antonio Zugarelli leads 2–0 on clay, while Jan Kodes leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Antonio Zugarelli won the 1981 Florence third round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 80
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 76
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 1981* | Florence | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Antonio Zugarelli | 6-2 6-0 | Jan Kodes | Match data |
| May 29, 1974* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Antonio Zugarelli | 7-6 3-6 5-4 (ret.) | Jan Kodes | Match data |
| Feb 21, 1974* | London Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jan Kodes | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Antonio Zugarelli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Kodes | #1,109 | #5 | 14 | 2,117 | 465 | 274 | 62.9% | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 10 |
| Antonio Zugarelli | #827 | #24 | 0 | 1,788 | 112 | 151 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan Kodes | Antonio Zugarelli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1968 | 23–18 | 56.1% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1969 | 32–19 | 62.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #69 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1970 | 58–31 | 65.2% | — | 1,817 | 1 | 3 | 1974 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #73 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1971 | 49–23 | 68.1% | — | 1,967 | 2 | 5 | 1975 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1972 | 44–15 | 74.6% | — | 1,937 | 2 | 6 | 1976 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #30 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1973 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #9 | 1,934 | 3 | 8 | 1977 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #44 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1974 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #17 | 1,936 | 3 | 8 | 1978 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #107 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1975 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #19 | 1,982 | 3 | 9 | 1979 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #135 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1976 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #19 | 1,983 | 3 | 10 | 1980 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #128 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1977 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,851 | 3 | 10 | 1981 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #128 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1978 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #119 | 1,754 | 3 | 10 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #287 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1979 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,701 | 3 | 10 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 1980 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #221 | 1,581 | 3 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1981 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #221 | 1,509 | 3 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1982 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,464 | 3 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #504 | 1,447 | 3 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |