H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jan Kodes vs Balazs Taroczy H2H: 2-2
Jan Kodes and Balazs Taroczy are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Balazs Taroczy leads 2–1 on clay, while Jan Kodes leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Balazs Taroczy won the 1979 Hilversum semifinal 4-6 6-3 7-5 6-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 80
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 72
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 1979* | Hilversum | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Balazs Taroczy | 4-6 6-3 7-5 6-7 6-3 | Jan Kodes | Match data |
| Oct 22, 1976* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Jan Kodes | 6-3 7-5 | Balazs Taroczy | Match data |
| Jun 6, 1976* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Balazs Taroczy | 6-4 6-2 6-1 | Jan Kodes | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1974* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Jan Kodes | 5-7 4-6 7-6 7-6 6-3 | Balazs Taroczy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Kodes | #1,109 | #5 | 14 | 2,117 | 465 | 274 | 62.9% | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 10 |
| Balazs Taroczy | #732 | #12 | 0 | 2,003 | 381 | 228 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan Kodes | Balazs Taroczy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #193 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #38 | 1,771 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #69 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1968 | 23–18 | 56.1% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1969 | 32–19 | 62.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #32 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1970 | 58–31 | 65.2% | — | 1,817 | 1 | 3 | 1978 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #20 | 1,907 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1971 | 49–23 | 68.1% | — | 1,967 | 2 | 5 | 1979 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #42 | 1,812 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1972 | 44–15 | 74.6% | — | 1,937 | 2 | 6 | 1980 | 46–16 | 74.2% | #22 | 1,931 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1973 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #9 | 1,934 | 3 | 8 | 1981 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1974 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #17 | 1,936 | 3 | 8 | 1982 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 13 |
| 29 | 1975 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #19 | 1,982 | 3 | 9 | 1983 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,781 | 0 | 13 |
| 30 | 1976 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #19 | 1,983 | 3 | 10 | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #43 | 1,748 | 0 | 13 |
| 31 | 1977 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,851 | 3 | 10 | 1985 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #157 | 1,643 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | 1978 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #119 | 1,754 | 3 | 10 | 1986 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #382 | 1,641 | 0 | 13 |
| 33 | 1979 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,701 | 3 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1980 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #221 | 1,581 | 3 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1981 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #221 | 1,509 | 3 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1982 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,464 | 3 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #504 | 1,447 | 3 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |