H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jan Kodes vs Buster C Mottram H2H: 1-3
Buster C Mottram holds a 3–1 lead over Jan Kodes in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Buster C Mottram leads 1–0 on carpet, while Jan Kodes leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Buster C Mottram won the 1979 US Open second round 6-3 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 80
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 1979* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Buster C Mottram | 6-3 7-6 6-2 | Jan Kodes | Match data |
| Oct 9, 1976* | Aviles | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Jan Kodes | 6-3 6-2 | Buster C Mottram | Match data |
| Nov 20, 1975* | London | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Buster C Mottram | 6-0 6-1 | Jan Kodes | Match data |
| Jun 16, 1971* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Buster C Mottram | 6-2 6-3 | Jan Kodes | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Kodes | #1,109 | #5 | 14 | 2,117 | 465 | 274 | 62.9% | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 10 |
| Buster C Mottram | #735 | #15 | 0 | 1,952 | 270 | 177 | 60.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jan Kodes | Buster C Mottram | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 23–18 | 56.1% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1969 | 32–19 | 62.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 58–31 | 65.2% | — | 1,817 | 1 | 3 | 1972 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 1971 | 49–23 | 68.1% | — | 1,967 | 2 | 5 | 1973 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #33 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 1972 | 44–15 | 74.6% | — | 1,937 | 2 | 6 | 1974 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #55 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #9 | 1,934 | 3 | 8 | 1975 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #34 | 1,897 | 0 | 2 |
| 1974 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #17 | 1,936 | 3 | 8 | 1976 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #41 | 1,852 | 0 | 3 |
| 1975 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #19 | 1,982 | 3 | 9 | 1977 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #20 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 |
| 1976 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #19 | 1,983 | 3 | 10 | 1978 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 3 |
| 1977 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,851 | 3 | 10 | 1979 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #32 | 1,873 | 0 | 3 |
| 1978 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #119 | 1,754 | 3 | 10 | 1980 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,824 | 0 | 3 |
| 1979 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,701 | 3 | 10 | 1981 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,773 | 0 | 3 |
| 1980 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #221 | 1,581 | 3 | 10 | 1982 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 3 |
| 1981 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #221 | 1,509 | 3 | 10 | 1983 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #91 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |
| 1982 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,464 | 3 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #504 | 1,447 | 3 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |