H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jan Kodes vs Ken Rosewall H2H: 1-4
Ken Rosewall holds a 4–1 lead over Jan Kodes in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Ken Rosewall leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ken Rosewall won the 1977 Houston Wct fourth round 2-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 80
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
4
5 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 91
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 1977* | Houston Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Ken Rosewall | 2-1 (ret.) | Jan Kodes | Match data |
| Apr 7, 1973* | Houston Wct | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Ken Rosewall | 6-2 6-2 | Jan Kodes | Match data |
| Apr 6, 1973* | Vancouver Wct | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Jan Kodes | 7-6(1) 2-6 6-3 | Ken Rosewall | Match data |
| Dec 9, 1970 | Masters | ATP Finals | RR | Carpet | Ken Rosewall | 6-5 6-4 | Jan Kodes | Match data |
| Nov 4, 1970* | Stockholm Open | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Ken Rosewall | 6-3 6-4 | Jan Kodes | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Kodes | #1,109 | #5 | 14 | 2,117 | 465 | 274 | 62.9% | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 10 |
| Ken Rosewall | #255 | #2 | 0 | 2,231 | 541 | 195 | 73.5% | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 40 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan Kodes | Ken Rosewall | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 1968 | 23–18 | 56.1% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1969 | 32–19 | 62.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1970 | 58–31 | 65.2% | — | 1,817 | 1 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1971 | 49–23 | 68.1% | — | 1,967 | 2 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1972 | 44–15 | 74.6% | — | 1,937 | 2 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1973 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #9 | 1,934 | 3 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1974 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #17 | 1,936 | 3 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1975 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #19 | 1,982 | 3 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1976 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #19 | 1,983 | 3 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1977 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,851 | 3 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1978 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #119 | 1,754 | 3 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1979 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,701 | 3 | 10 | 1968 | 45–12 | 78.9% | — | 1,856 | 1 | 5 |
| 34 | 1980 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #221 | 1,581 | 3 | 10 | 1969 | 49–21 | 70.0% | — | 1,941 | 1 | 8 |
| 35 | 1981 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #221 | 1,509 | 3 | 10 | 1970 | 72–21 | 77.4% | — | 2,083 | 2 | 14 |
| 36 | 1982 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,464 | 3 | 10 | 1971 | 80–24 | 76.9% | — | 2,154 | 3 | 22 |
| 37 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #504 | 1,447 | 3 | 10 | 1972 | 61–15 | 80.3% | — | 2,107 | 4 | 29 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #6 | 2,102 | 4 | 34 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 28–8 | 77.8% | #9 | 2,106 | 4 | 34 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #6 | 1,994 | 4 | 37 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #13 | 1,974 | 4 | 39 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 39–20 | 66.1% | #12 | 1,975 | 4 | 40 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #34 | 1,808 | 4 | 40 |
| 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #207 | 1,746 | 4 | 40 |
| 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #255 | 1,746 | 4 | 40 |