H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jan Kodes vs Nikola Pilic H2H: 2-2
Jan Kodes and Nikola Pilic are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nikola Pilic leads 1–0 on carpet, while Jan Kodes leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jan Kodes won the 1978 Roland Garros second round 3-6 6-3 7-5 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 80
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
CRO
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 1978* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Jan Kodes | 3-6 6-3 7-5 7-6 | Nikola Pilic | Match data |
| Sep 9, 1973* | US Open | Grand Slam | QF | Grass | Jan Kodes | 6-2 4-6 6-1 3-6 7-5 | Nikola Pilic | Match data |
| Nov 8, 1972* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Nikola Pilic | 6-4 7-5 | Jan Kodes | Match data |
| Nov 19, 1970* | Wembley | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Nikola Pilic | 5-7 7-5 6-4 | Jan Kodes | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Kodes | #1,109 | #5 | 14 | 2,117 | 465 | 274 | 62.9% | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 10 |
| Nikola Pilic | #284 | #12 | 0 | 1,953 | 301 | 248 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan Kodes | Nikola Pilic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 1968 | 23–18 | 56.1% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1969 | 32–19 | 62.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1970 | 58–31 | 65.2% | — | 1,817 | 1 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1971 | 49–23 | 68.1% | — | 1,967 | 2 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1972 | 44–15 | 74.6% | — | 1,937 | 2 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1973 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #9 | 1,934 | 3 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1974 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #17 | 1,936 | 3 | 8 | 1968 | 42–46 | 47.7% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1975 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #19 | 1,982 | 3 | 9 | 1969 | 27–24 | 52.9% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1976 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #19 | 1,983 | 3 | 10 | 1970 | 47–31 | 60.3% | — | 1,891 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1977 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,851 | 3 | 10 | 1971 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1978 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #119 | 1,754 | 3 | 10 | 1972 | 34–28 | 54.8% | — | 1,894 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 1979 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,701 | 3 | 10 | 1973 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 1980 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #221 | 1,581 | 3 | 10 | 1974 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #32 | 1,898 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 1981 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #221 | 1,509 | 3 | 10 | 1975 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #50 | 1,857 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | 1982 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,464 | 3 | 10 | 1976 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #68 | 1,743 | 0 | 6 |
| 37 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #504 | 1,447 | 3 | 10 | 1977 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #91 | 1,701 | 0 | 6 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #284 | 1,622 | 0 | 6 |