H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jan Kodes vs Pat Cramer H2H: 4-1
Jan Kodes holds a 4–1 lead over Pat Cramer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jan Kodes leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jan Kodes won the 1976 Aviles third round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 80
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4
–
1
5 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 1976* | Aviles | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jan Kodes | 6-2 6-0 | Pat Cramer | Match data |
| Jul 6, 1976* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Jan Kodes | 6-1 7-6 | Pat Cramer | Match data |
| Aug 30, 1974* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Jan Kodes | 6-4 6-4 6-2 | Pat Cramer | Match data |
| Sep 19, 1973* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Pat Cramer | 7-6 6-3 | Jan Kodes | Match data |
| May 25, 1973* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Jan Kodes | 6-1 6-0 | Pat Cramer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Kodes | #1,109 | #5 | 14 | 2,117 | 465 | 274 | 62.9% | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 10 |
| Pat Cramer | #389 | #95 | 0 | 1,668 | 62 | 103 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan Kodes | Pat Cramer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 5–2 | 71.4% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1968 | 23–18 | 56.1% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1969 | 32–19 | 62.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1970 | 58–31 | 65.2% | — | 1,817 | 1 | 3 | 1971 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1971 | 49–23 | 68.1% | — | 1,967 | 2 | 5 | 1972 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1972 | 44–15 | 74.6% | — | 1,937 | 2 | 6 | 1973 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #106 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1973 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #9 | 1,934 | 3 | 8 | 1974 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #160 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1974 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #17 | 1,936 | 3 | 8 | 1975 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1975 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #19 | 1,982 | 3 | 9 | 1976 | 2–20 | 9.1% | #191 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1976 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #19 | 1,983 | 3 | 10 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1977 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,851 | 3 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1978 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #119 | 1,754 | 3 | 10 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #389 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1979 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,701 | 3 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1980 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #221 | 1,581 | 3 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1981 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #221 | 1,509 | 3 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1982 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,464 | 3 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #504 | 1,447 | 3 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |