H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jan Kodes vs Tony Giammalva H2H: 1-1

Jan Kodes and Tony Giammalva are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jan Kodes leads 1–0 on grass, while Tony Giammalva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tony Giammalva won the 1981 Cologne round of 32 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jan Kodes
CZE Age 80 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Tony Giammalva
USA Age 68 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tony Giammalva #64 7-5 6-2 Jan Kodes Match data Oct 29, 1981* R32 Cologne ATP 250 Hard
Jan Kodes 7-6 5-7 6-3 6-3 Tony Giammalva #90 Match data Jun 25, 1980* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jan Kodes #1,109 #5 14 2,122 471 276 63.1% 3 0 0 0 7 10
Tony Giammalva #692 #54 0 1,737 54 78 40.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jan Kodes Tony Giammalva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1976 0–1 0.0% #310 1,480 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1977 1–3 25.0% #322 1,481 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1978 0–1 0.0% #200 1,481 0 0
22 1968 23–18 56.1% — 1,605 0 0 1980 13–12 52.0% #71 1,609 0 0
23 1969 32–19 62.7% — 1,738 0 1 1981 17–21 44.7% #78 1,681 0 0
24 1970 58–31 65.2% — 1,820 1 3 1982 10–16 38.5% #81 1,646 0 0
25 1971 49–23 68.1% — 1,977 2 5 1983 7–11 38.9% #177 1,613 0 0
26 1972 44–15 74.6% — 1,941 2 6 1984 6–11 35.3% #119 1,588 0 0
27 1973 51–20 71.8% #9 1,936 3 8 1985 0–2 0.0% #691 1,567 0 0
28 1974 45–23 66.2% #17 1,922 3 8 — — — — — — —
29 1975 55–21 72.4% #19 1,985 3 9 — — — — — — —
30 1976 49–21 70.0% #19 1,986 3 10 — — — — — — —
31 1977 30–25 54.5% #41 1,854 3 10 — — — — — — —
32 1978 13–18 41.9% #119 1,757 3 10 — — — — — — —
33 1979 16–16 50.0% #88 1,704 3 10 — — — — — — —
34 1980 5–13 27.8% #221 1,583 3 10 — — — — — — —
35 1981 1–7 12.5% — 1,510 3 10 — — — — — — —
36 1982 0–5 0.0% — 1,466 3 10 — — — — — — —
37 1983 0–1 0.0% #504 1,449 3 10 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jan Kodes Tony Giammalva
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1968 10 6 16 62.5% 13 8 21 61.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1980 5 5 10 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 1969 7 5 12 58.3% 20 9 29 69.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1981 4 7 11 36.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
24 1970 16 12 28 57.1% 42 11 53 79.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 7 7 0.0% 1982 1 1 2 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
25 1971 15 9 24 62.5% 25 6 31 80.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1983 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 1972 5 3 8 62.5% 31 7 38 81.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1984 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1973 0 3 3 0.0% 19 7 26 73.1% 16 2 18 88.9% 16 8 24 66.7% 1985 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1974 7 4 11 63.6% 16 9 25 64.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1975 1 2 3 33.3% 35 10 45 77.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1976 — — — — 38 13 51 74.5% — — — — 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1977 7 8 15 46.7% 19 10 29 65.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1978 3 3 6 50.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1979 6 6 12 50.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1980 0 3 3 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1982 — — — — 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 77 65 142 54.2% 281 127 408 68.9% 43 22 65 66.2% 70 62 132 53.0% — 17 22 39 43.6% 18 26 44 40.9% 8 13 21 38.1% 11 17 28 39.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jan Kodes Tony Giammalva
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1480 96.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.15
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1481 106.0 — — — — — +34 — 22.2% -2.22 1–0 0–1 — -0.12
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1481 113.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.26
22 1968 1605 118.0 — — — — -36 +42 — 56.1% +0.68 5–9 (36%) — — -0.12 1980 1610 126.0 — — — — +3 -26 — 59.3% +0.44 3–6 (33%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.80
23 1969 1738 130.3 — — — — -81 +93 -208 60.3% +0.76 10–9 (53%) — — +2.03 1981 1682 143.3 — — — — -40 -27 -79 48.0% -0.34 4–8 (33%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.80
24 1970 1820 143.1 — — — — -122 +159 — 63.2% +1.07 11–11 (50%) 3–0 (100%) — +2.16 1982 1646 130.6 — — — — +10 -25 -45 42.6% -0.64 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) — -1.10
25 1971 1978 151.3 — — — — -117 +115 -220 62.9% +0.93 16–9 (64%) 7–2 (78%) — -1.49 1983 1613 129.1 — — — — +27 — +5 42.3% -0.15 3–4 (43%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.71
26 1972 1942 149.8 — — — — -111 +207 -133 68.5% +1.30 8–5 (62%) 7–3 (70%) — +0.38 1984 1589 123.3 — — — — +49 — — 41.7% -0.33 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.19
27 1973 1937 151.7 — — — — -54 +97 +95 65.5% +1.02 14–8 (64%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.84 1985 1567 103.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.60 — — — -0.17
28 1974 1923 150.6 — — — — +12 +34 +136 63.7% +0.97 10–9 (53%) 8–7 (53%) — -2.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1975 1986 152.7 — — — — -43 +124 -4 65.8% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 8–6 (57%) — +1.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1976 1986 154.1 — — — — -46 +46 — 64.5% +1.06 11–6 (65%) 8–12 (40%) — +1.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1977 1855 150.0 — — — — -30 +83 — 55.2% +0.36 9–10 (47%) 8–3 (73%) — -2.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1978 1757 139.9 — — — — +40 +72 — 43.8% -0.40 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) — -2.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1979 1704 135.5 — — — — +72 +67 — 47.7% -0.22 8–6 (57%) 7–7 (50%) — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1980 1584 112.7 — — — — +90 +91 — 30.4% -1.65 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1981 1510 103.4 — — — — — +86 — 15.8% -2.63 0–1 — — +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1982 1466 103.6 — — — — — +64 — 0.0% -3.20 — — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1983 1449 96.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2122 150.1 — — — — -50 +102 -11 60.1% +0.73 123–100 (55%) 65–52 (56%) 100.3 -0.18 — 1737 137.7 — — — — +3 -20 -32 45.2% -0.38 16–28 (36%) 21–21 (50%) 98.6 -0.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.