H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jan Kukal vs Ion Tiriac H2H: 1-1
Jan Kukal and Ion Tiriac are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jan Kukal leads 1–0 on carpet, while Ion Tiriac leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ion Tiriac won the 1971 Monte Carlo fourth round 10-8 6-0 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 83
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 87
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 1971* | Monte Carlo | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Ion Tiriac | 10-8 6-0 8-6 | Jan Kukal | Match data |
| Mar 6, 1970* | Hampton | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Jan Kukal | 6-4 5-7 7-5 | Ion Tiriac | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Kukal | #955 | #115 | 5 | 1,656 | 57 | 81 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ion Tiriac | #439 | #55 | 0 | 1,899 | 228 | 190 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan Kukal | Ion Tiriac | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 25 | 1968 | 16–17 | 48.5% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1969 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1970 | 13–13 | 50.0% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1971 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1972 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 60–12 | 83.3% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1973 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #216 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1974 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 1975 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #306 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 27–16 | 62.8% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #288 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 35–35 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,683 | 0 | 8 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,622 | 0 | 8 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #138 | 1,589 | 0 | 8 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #248 | 1,534 | 0 | 8 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,633 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #263 | 1,523 | 0 | 8 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #439 | 1,525 | 0 | 8 |