H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jan Kukal vs Mark Cox H2H: 1-3
Mark Cox holds a 3–1 lead over Jan Kukal in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mark Cox leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mark Cox won the 1969 Curacao quarterfinal 8-6 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 83
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 83
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 1969* | Curacao | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Mark Cox | 8-6 4-6 6-3 | Jan Kukal | Match data |
| Nov 15, 1968* | London 2 | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mark Cox | 6-1 10-8 6-8 6-3 | Jan Kukal | Match data |
| Nov 2, 1968* | Aberavon | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Mark Cox | 7-5 14-12 | Jan Kukal | Match data |
| Mar 14, 1968* | Caracas | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jan Kukal | 7-9 6-2 6-4 | Mark Cox | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan Kukal | Mark Cox | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 52–23 | 69.3% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1968 | 16–17 | 48.5% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 35–16 | 68.6% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1969 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1970 | 13–13 | 50.0% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 27–31 | 46.6% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1971 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 43–29 | 59.7% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 1972 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 56–28 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,890 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1973 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #216 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 1974 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #25 | 1,915 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | 1975 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #306 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,954 | 0 | 14 |
| 33 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #288 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 15 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #68 | 1,765 | 0 | 15 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #76 | 1,786 | 0 | 15 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #140 | 1,673 | 0 | 15 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,597 | 0 | 15 |