H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jan-Lennard Struff vs Albert Ramos-Vinolas H2H: 4-2

Jan-Lennard Struff holds a 4–2 lead over Albert Ramos-Vinolas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Jan-Lennard Struff leads 2–1 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jan-Lennard Struff won the 2024 Swiss Open Gstaad first round 7-6(6) 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jan-Lennard Struff
Germany Age 36 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Spain Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jan-Lennard Struff #37 7-6(6) 7-6(4) Albert Ramos-Vinolas #97 Match data Jul 18, 2024* R32 Swiss Open Gstaad ATP 250 Clay
Jan-Lennard Struff #100 6-4 6-3 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #50 Match data Apr 11, 2023* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Jan-Lennard Struff #50 6-3 3-6 6-3 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #45 Match data Oct 21, 2021* R32 Antwerp ATP 250 Hard
Jan-Lennard Struff #51 6-7(5) 6-2 7-6(1) Albert Ramos-Vinolas #22 Match data Oct 27, 2017* R16 Vienna Open ATP 500 Hard
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #25 7-6(4) 6-4 Jan-Lennard Struff #58 Match data Oct 13, 2017* R16 Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #64 6-4 7-6(2) Jan-Lennard Struff #121 Match data Apr 24, 2013* R64 Barcelona Open ATP 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jan-Lennard Struff #44 #21 1,628 2,001 230 266 46.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #477 #17 2,180 1,967 276 328 45.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jan-Lennard Struff Albert Ramos-Vinolas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
22 — — — — — — — 2010 2–4 33.3% #123 1,554 0 0
23 2013 4–9 30.8% #107 1,585 0 0 2011 13–16 44.8% #66 1,722 0 0
24 2014 15–17 46.9% #59 1,721 0 0 2012 26–30 46.4% #50 1,729 0 0
25 2015 4–18 18.2% #107 1,625 0 0 2013 19–22 46.3% #83 1,646 0 0
26 2016 11–18 37.9% #63 1,784 0 0 2014 13–20 39.4% #63 1,726 0 0
27 2017 27–28 49.1% #53 1,856 0 0 2015 16–23 41.0% #54 1,768 0 0
28 2018 23–24 48.9% #57 1,856 0 0 2016 34–31 52.3% #27 1,884 0 1
29 2019 34–27 55.7% #35 1,883 0 0 2017 33–30 52.4% #23 1,814 0 1
30 2020 11–14 44.0% #36 1,821 0 0 2018 18–28 39.1% #65 1,700 0 1
31 2021 23–27 46.0% #51 1,765 0 0 2019 30–24 55.6% #41 1,854 0 2
32 2022 3–10 23.1% #150 1,677 0 0 2020 9–14 39.1% #46 1,704 0 2
33 2023 20–17 54.1% #25 1,806 0 0 2021 24–25 49.0% #45 1,730 0 3
34 2024 28–21 57.1% #42 1,883 0 1 2022 24–27 47.1% #39 1,741 0 4
35 2025 14–21 40.0% #83 1,822 0 1 2023 12–23 34.3% #89 1,644 0 4
36 2026 13–15 46.4% #44 1,794 0 1 2024 3–9 25.0% #165 1,563 0 4
37 — — — — — — — 2025 0–2 0.0% #403 1,565 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jan-Lennard Struff Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
23 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — —
24 2014 9 8 17 52.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 16 13 29 55.2% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2015 4 8 12 33.3% 0 7 7 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2013 4 8 12 33.3% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2016 7 9 16 43.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2014 1 6 7 14.3% 12 14 26 46.2% — — — —
27 2017 16 15 31 51.6% 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2015 7 8 15 46.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2018 13 13 26 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2016 13 16 29 44.8% 19 13 32 59.4% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 2019 17 17 34 50.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 2017 9 15 24 37.5% 22 13 35 62.9% 2 2 4 50.0%
30 2020 10 11 21 47.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2018 5 13 18 27.8% 13 14 27 48.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2021 11 16 27 40.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2019 8 11 19 42.1% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 2022 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2020 2 5 7 28.6% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — —
33 2023 6 10 16 37.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 2021 5 11 16 31.3% 19 11 30 63.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
34 2024 7 12 19 36.8% 15 6 21 71.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 2022 5 11 16 31.3% 19 14 33 57.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
35 2025 8 11 19 42.1% 3 7 10 30.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2023 1 7 8 12.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
36 2026 3 8 11 27.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2024 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
Career — 114 147 261 43.7% 82 82 164 50.0% 34 37 71 47.9% — 72 135 207 34.8% 198 174 372 53.2% 6 19 25 24.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 487/497 of Jan-Lennard Struff's and 602/604 of Albert Ramos-Vinolas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jan-Lennard Struff Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 6/6 2.5 1.8 66.2% 60.9% 51.8% 60.4% 46.9% 57.6% 36.1%
23 2013 13/13 6.5 4.1 61.6% 71.3% 49.5% 45.8% 36.0% 62.6% 37.0% 2011 29/29 3.9 3.0 60.1% 69.1% 50.5% 63.4% 38.7% 61.6% 37.0%
24 2014 32/32 6.2 2.3 58.5% 73.9% 51.7% 59.7% 39.0% 64.5% 35.9% 2012 55/56 3.2 3.3 59.1% 66.7% 51.5% 59.4% 43.4% 60.6% 38.7%
25 2015 22/22 9.3 4.8 59.2% 75.0% 45.5% 55.1% 37.8% 62.7% 32.6% 2013 41/41 3.4 2.4 61.5% 69.1% 53.3% 51.7% 44.1% 62.9% 37.6%
26 2016 28/29 7.2 4.5 52.7% 76.8% 50.3% 54.3% 39.2% 64.3% 36.3% 2014 33/33 2.3 2.0 64.4% 65.9% 50.1% 52.1% 47.9% 60.1% 37.3%
27 2017 55/55 8.3 4.3 53.2% 77.9% 50.3% 63.5% 39.5% 65.0% 34.8% 2015 39/39 3.6 2.2 62.9% 68.7% 53.8% 64.3% 41.5% 63.2% 35.8%
28 2018 47/47 10.3 4.3 56.2% 76.6% 48.5% 58.8% 46.1% 64.2% 35.2% 2016 64/65 3.7 2.8 62.8% 68.4% 51.1% 59.0% 48.8% 61.9% 37.7%
29 2019 61/61 11.0 2.8 55.8% 79.2% 51.8% 65.6% 39.6% 67.3% 36.4% 2017 63/63 4.5 2.6 61.4% 67.8% 52.8% 58.9% 39.0% 62.0% 37.9%
30 2020 25/25 8.9 2.9 55.4% 75.8% 47.9% 64.2% 32.8% 63.3% 37.5% 2018 46/46 3.9 2.8 60.6% 69.6% 48.7% 59.4% 32.8% 61.3% 33.7%
31 2021 47/50 9.2 4.0 55.5% 74.0% 47.9% 55.8% 33.9% 62.4% 36.6% 2019 54/54 2.9 1.8 63.4% 69.5% 54.3% 61.2% 45.2% 63.8% 37.8%
32 2022 13/13 10.5 3.8 57.3% 75.3% 49.0% 55.4% 34.9% 64.1% 32.8% 2020 23/23 2.3 2.7 61.6% 64.6% 53.3% 58.9% 39.7% 60.5% 36.9%
33 2023 37/37 9.7 3.6 58.6% 75.2% 50.5% 64.9% 44.3% 65.2% 34.9% 2021 49/49 2.9 2.4 62.6% 68.5% 51.5% 53.8% 42.1% 62.1% 39.0%
34 2024 46/49 10.0 4.4 57.9% 77.6% 52.3% 65.0% 35.8% 66.9% 37.1% 2022 51/51 2.5 1.8 64.9% 66.5% 51.5% 56.6% 42.9% 61.2% 37.8%
35 2025 34/35 9.4 3.5 58.6% 74.1% 49.2% 50.2% 30.1% 63.6% 34.0% 2023 35/35 2.9 2.0 65.2% 65.2% 50.1% 64.4% 42.5% 60.1% 37.2%
36 2026 27/29 11.0 3.9 57.9% 72.6% 49.3% 61.9% 34.3% 63.0% 33.5% 2024 12/12 1.0 1.8 61.5% 59.6% 44.2% 50.8% 37.1% 53.8% 34.6%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 2/2 2.0 2.5 64.5% 61.5% 52.5% 56.0% 37.5% 58.0% 31.5%
Career — 487/497 9.3 3.8 56.6% 75.9% 49.8% 60.0% 38.0% 64.6% 35.5% — 602/604 3.3 2.4 62.4% 67.6% 51.6% 58.5% 42.4% 61.5% 37.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jan-Lennard Struff Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2009 1452 96.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1487 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 1437 107.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1480 92.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 1417 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1471 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2012 1380 96.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1554 112.8 -2.03 -1.22 0.853 47.4% — +71 — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.05
23 2013 1586 121.5 -1.23 +0.31 0.991 49.6% -69 -29 +15 38.9% -0.39 1–2 (33%) 1–7 (13%) — +0.50 2011 1723 132.7 -0.88 -0.32 0.962 49.3% -126 +59 — 43.7% -0.32 5–5 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.23
24 2014 1722 139.8 +0.16 -0.05 1.012 50.3% -12 -77 -156 40.3% -0.42 7–3 (70%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.72 2012 1729 149.2 -1.59 +1.54 0.983 49.6% -70 +70 — 45.2% -0.28 4–7 (36%) 12–18 (40%) — -0.55
25 2015 1625 133.3 -1.42 -2.36 0.872 47.8% +51 -34 -85 30.6% -0.89 4–8 (33%) 6–12 (33%) — -0.45 2013 1646 141.1 -0.38 +0.44 1.014 50.1% -91 +168 -87 48.5% -0.15 5–10 (33%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.49
26 2016 1784 143.3 +0.54 +0.57 1.018 50.3% +5 -104 -264 42.7% -0.23 4–8 (33%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.92 2014 1727 143.5 -2.00 +0.37 0.934 48.8% -165 +124 — 38.0% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 1–11 (8%) — -1.20
27 2017 1856 152.0 +1.05 -0.70 0.994 50.1% -7 -109 -333 47.3% -0.08 8–8 (50%) 11–18 (38%) — -1.13 2015 1768 152.4 -0.04 +0.07 0.974 49.5% -88 +32 -159 43.6% -0.40 3–10 (23%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.24
28 2018 1857 148.2 +0.47 -0.42 0.985 49.9% -17 -133 -246 49.6% -0.05 9–10 (47%) 15–14 (52%) — -0.96 2016 1884 158.2 -1.18 +1.68 0.990 49.9% -90 +94 -207 48.8% +0.06 14–8 (64%) 8–16 (33%) — -2.25
29 2019 1884 157.4 +2.72 +1.70 1.113 51.5% -64 +3 -176 54.2% +0.38 10–10 (50%) 13–15 (46%) — -2.42 2017 1814 155.6 -0.89 +1.55 0.996 50.0% -85 +157 -119 50.0% +0.10 18–14 (56%) 14–18 (44%) — +3.34
30 2020 1821 155.2 +0.74 +0.67 1.021 50.2% +13 -16 — 47.0% -0.03 3–5 (38%) 4–7 (36%) — -1.42 2018 1700 139.0 -1.71 -1.37 0.872 47.7% -16 +112 — 42.0% -0.71 9–10 (47%) 11–7 (61%) — +2.45
31 2021 1766 144.6 -0.12 -0.04 0.974 49.4% -30 +102 -91 47.6% -0.24 6–10 (38%) 12–11 (52%) — -0.32 2019 1855 153.7 +0.41 +1.33 1.046 50.9% -114 +113 — 53.2% +0.32 7–6 (54%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.29
32 2022 1677 122.0 +0.37 -2.56 0.912 48.2% -3 — -65 33.3% -0.61 2–4 (33%) 1–7 (13%) — -0.69 2020 1704 132.0 -1.84 -0.55 0.934 48.9% -30 +113 — 43.3% -0.38 3–6 (33%) 4–11 (27%) — +0.07
33 2023 1807 145.1 +1.27 -0.07 1.005 50.1% -83 +104 -90 51.6% +0.11 10–8 (56%) 11–11 (50%) — -0.08 2021 1731 142.2 -0.29 +1.34 1.029 50.4% -66 +87 -159 48.1% -0.02 13–12 (52%) 7–14 (33%) — -0.43
34 2024 1883 151.8 +3.06 +1.41 1.121 51.7% -174 +103 -53 58.6% +0.42 8–10 (44%) 25–16 (61%) — -2.74 2022 1742 139.7 -1.81 +1.14 0.973 49.3% -91 +77 — 47.2% -0.26 8–10 (44%) 10–12 (45%) — +1.15
35 2025 1823 139.7 -0.04 -0.88 0.935 48.5% -52 +32 -3 42.1% -0.60 5–4 (56%) 7–10 (41%) — -2.29 2023 1645 131.6 -2.86 -0.15 0.933 48.8% -74 +108 — 37.9% -0.32 9–10 (47%) 3–11 (21%) — +1.27
36 2026 1794 128.3 -0.48 -1.66 0.905 48.5% -139 +3 +121 45.0% -0.49 7–6 (54%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.16 2024 1564 117.8 -4.99 -1.79 0.749 44.7% — +77 — 21.4% -1.93 2–0 0–4 (0%) — -0.06
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1566 115.1 +0.20 +0.65 0.750 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.60 — — — -0.39
Career — 2001 149.8 +0.84 -0.04 1.003 50.0% -39 -4 -94 47.2% -0.13 84–96 (47%) 127–150 (46%) 98.2 -3.01 — 1967 149.2 -1.17 +0.67 0.970 49.4% -82 +102 -148 45.5% -0.21 107–114 (48%) 96–157 (38%) 90.1 +0.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.