H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jan-Lennard Struff vs Andrey Golubev H2H: 0-1
Andrey Golubev holds a 1–0 lead over Jan-Lennard Struff in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrey Golubev leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrey Golubev won the 2013 St. Petersburg third round 6-7(3) 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 36
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2013* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Andrey Golubev | 6-7(3) 6-3 6-1 | Jan-Lennard Struff | Match data |
| Jul 9, 2012 | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | Q1 | Clay | Andrey Golubev | 6-4 6-2 | Jan-Lennard Struff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Lennard Struff | #41 | #21 | 1,628 | 2,001 | 225 | 261 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Andrey Golubev | #1,694 | #33 | 1,210 | 1,781 | 51 | 107 | 32.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan-Lennard Struff | Andrey Golubev | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #177 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #133 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #107 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–22 | 15.4% | #147 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2014 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #59 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #161 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2015 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #107 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2016 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #63 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #74 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2017 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #53 | 1,855 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #206 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2018 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2019 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #35 | 1,884 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2020 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #36 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2021 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #25 | 1,805 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,868 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2026 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #41 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |