H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jan-Lennard Struff vs Bernard Tomic H2H: 1-2

Bernard Tomic holds a 2–1 lead over Jan-Lennard Struff in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Bernard Tomic leads 2–0 on grass, while Jan-Lennard Struff leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jan-Lennard Struff won the 2017 Italian Open first round 6-7(8) 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jan-Lennard Struff
Germany Age 36 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Bernard Tomic
Australia Age 33 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jan-Lennard Struff #52 6-7(8) 6-1 6-4 Bernard Tomic #40 Match data May 16, 2017* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Bernard Tomic #26 6-3 3-6 2-6 6-2 6-3 Jan-Lennard Struff #112 Match data Jul 1, 2015* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Bernard Tomic #24 6-3 7-6(5) Jan-Lennard Struff #105 Match data Jun 11, 2015* R32 Stuttgart Open ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jan-Lennard Struff #44 #21 1,628 2,001 229 266 46.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Bernard Tomic #179 #17 1,885 1,972 172 184 48.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jan-Lennard Struff Bernard Tomic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2009 1–3 25.0% #286 1,526 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2010 2–6 25.0% #208 1,591 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2011 14–14 50.0% #42 1,791 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2012 22–26 45.8% #52 1,756 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2013 21–22 48.8% #51 1,786 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 2014 17–16 51.5% #56 1,834 0 2
22 — — — — — — — 2015 37–27 57.8% #18 1,914 0 3
23 2013 4–9 30.8% #107 1,585 0 0 2016 28–23 54.9% #26 1,874 0 3
24 2014 15–17 46.9% #59 1,721 0 0 2017 10–20 33.3% #140 1,728 0 3
25 2015 4–18 18.2% #107 1,625 0 0 2018 9–7 56.2% #83 1,745 0 4
26 2016 11–18 37.9% #63 1,784 0 0 2019 7–15 31.8% #185 1,620 0 4
27 2017 27–28 49.1% #53 1,856 0 0 2020 0–1 0.0% #226 1,589 0 4
28 2018 23–24 48.9% #57 1,856 0 0 2021 1–1 50.0% #260 1,608 0 4
29 2019 34–27 55.7% #35 1,883 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2020 11–14 44.0% #36 1,821 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2021 23–27 46.0% #51 1,765 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2022 3–10 23.1% #150 1,677 0 0 2025 1–2 33.3% #192 1,592 0 4
33 2023 20–17 54.1% #25 1,806 0 0 2026 2–1 66.7% #179 1,573 0 4
34 2024 28–21 57.1% #42 1,883 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2025 14–21 40.0% #83 1,822 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2026 12–15 44.4% #44 1,794 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jan-Lennard Struff Bernard Tomic
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 15 13 28 53.6% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 4 4 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 15 15 30 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 14 11 25 56.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 31 17 48 64.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
23 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2016 19 14 33 57.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
24 2014 9 8 17 52.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2017 3 10 13 23.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
25 2015 4 8 12 33.3% 0 7 7 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2018 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 2016 7 9 16 43.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2017 16 15 31 51.6% 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2018 13 13 26 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2021 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2019 17 17 34 50.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 10 11 21 47.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 11 16 27 40.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2025 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
33 2023 6 10 16 37.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 2026 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
34 2024 7 12 19 36.8% 15 6 21 71.4% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 8 11 19 42.1% 3 7 10 30.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 2 8 10 20.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 113 147 260 43.5% 82 82 164 50.0% 34 37 71 47.9% — 121 110 231 52.4% 16 43 59 27.1% 35 31 66 53.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 487/497 of Jan-Lennard Struff's and 352/356 of Bernard Tomic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jan-Lennard Struff Bernard Tomic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 4/4 4.8 3.3 60.2% 56.3% 47.1% 57.1% 24.5% 52.6% 29.2%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 8/8 3.8 3.0 64.3% 65.2% 45.9% 58.2% 34.1% 58.3% 33.8%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 28/28 6.5 2.4 65.8% 70.0% 50.1% 63.0% 36.9% 62.9% 34.1%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 47/48 4.8 1.5 65.8% 67.4% 50.2% 57.5% 36.4% 61.4% 35.1%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 43/43 8.0 1.3 66.4% 71.1% 51.3% 64.6% 38.6% 64.4% 32.7%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 32/33 9.3 1.1 67.2% 73.6% 52.5% 58.0% 40.9% 66.8% 33.0%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 63/64 9.1 1.5 66.1% 73.1% 50.9% 66.3% 40.9% 65.5% 34.2%
23 2013 13/13 6.5 4.1 61.6% 71.3% 49.5% 45.8% 36.0% 62.6% 37.0% 2016 51/51 9.4 2.3 65.3% 72.5% 48.8% 59.9% 36.0% 64.4% 33.1%
24 2014 32/32 6.2 2.3 58.5% 73.9% 51.7% 59.7% 39.0% 64.5% 35.9% 2017 29/30 6.9 1.9 66.7% 69.5% 51.7% 60.9% 35.3% 63.3% 31.1%
25 2015 22/22 9.3 4.8 59.2% 75.0% 45.5% 55.1% 37.8% 62.7% 32.6% 2018 16/16 9.4 1.3 67.3% 73.5% 50.8% 61.3% 43.7% 66.0% 35.6%
26 2016 28/29 7.2 4.5 52.7% 76.8% 50.3% 54.3% 39.2% 64.3% 36.3% 2019 22/22 9.1 1.9 64.6% 68.5% 43.9% 56.2% 36.0% 59.5% 29.6%
27 2017 55/55 8.3 4.3 53.2% 77.9% 50.3% 63.5% 39.5% 65.0% 34.8% 2020 1/1 8.0 2.0 68.8% 64.1% 44.8% 76.5% 16.7% 58.1% 31.6%
28 2018 47/47 10.3 4.3 56.2% 76.6% 48.5% 58.8% 46.1% 64.2% 35.2% 2021 2/2 8.0 4.0 58.8% 68.0% 37.1% 65.6% 28.6% 56.1% 34.6%
29 2019 61/61 11.0 2.8 55.8% 79.2% 51.8% 65.6% 39.6% 67.3% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 25/25 8.9 2.9 55.4% 75.8% 47.9% 64.2% 32.8% 63.3% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 47/50 9.2 4.0 55.5% 74.0% 47.9% 55.8% 33.9% 62.4% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 13/13 10.5 3.8 57.3% 75.3% 49.0% 55.4% 34.9% 64.1% 32.8% 2025 3/3 5.3 2.0 58.0% 69.0% 48.3% 61.0% 37.7% 59.7% 33.3%
33 2023 37/37 9.7 3.6 58.6% 75.2% 50.5% 64.9% 44.3% 65.2% 34.9% 2026 3/3 8.3 2.7 63.0% 71.3% 41.3% 46.3% 38.0% 61.0% 40.3%
34 2024 46/49 10.0 4.4 57.9% 77.6% 52.3% 65.0% 35.8% 66.9% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 34/35 9.4 3.5 58.6% 74.1% 49.2% 50.2% 30.1% 63.6% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 27/29 11.0 3.9 57.9% 72.6% 49.3% 61.9% 34.3% 63.0% 33.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 487/497 9.3 3.8 56.6% 75.9% 49.8% 60.0% 38.0% 64.6% 35.5% — 352/356 7.9 1.8 65.8% 70.8% 49.9% 61.2% 37.8% 63.5% 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jan-Lennard Struff Bernard Tomic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1502 94.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1526 105.3 -2.94 -0.81 0.615 41.2% -3 — — 30.8% -2.23 — 3–0 (100%) — -0.09
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1591 118.9 -1.47 -0.26 0.811 46.8% -52 — +98 34.8% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.20
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1791 144.2 +0.77 -1.38 0.919 48.9% -92 — +124 51.9% -0.18 6–6 (50%) 13–4 (76%) — -0.34
19 2009 1452 96.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1757 150.9 -1.11 -0.69 0.907 48.6% +52 -169 +23 46.3% -0.31 7–6 (54%) 7–8 (47%) — -1.42
20 2010 1437 107.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1787 149.3 +0.99 -2.79 0.919 48.8% -8 -226 +96 50.5% -0.09 7–5 (58%) 16–12 (57%) — -1.00
21 2011 1417 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1835 142.5 +1.91 -1.36 0.995 49.7% +21 — +30 53.2% +0.01 7–5 (58%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.73
22 2012 1380 96.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1915 162.1 +1.61 -0.87 0.990 50.4% +64 -388 -38 57.6% +0.46 12–12 (50%) 18–21 (46%) — +2.35
23 2013 1586 121.5 -1.23 +0.31 0.991 49.6% -69 -29 +15 38.9% -0.39 1–2 (33%) 1–7 (13%) — +0.50 2016 1875 151.1 +0.69 -2.24 0.928 49.4% +25 -337 +82 57.0% +0.26 9–7 (56%) 12–15 (44%) — +2.21
24 2014 1722 139.8 +0.16 -0.05 1.012 50.3% -12 -77 -156 40.3% -0.42 7–3 (70%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.72 2017 1728 133.1 -0.38 -4.25 0.846 47.7% -3 -160 +146 36.6% -0.72 4–3 (57%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.82
25 2015 1625 133.3 -1.42 -2.36 0.872 47.8% +51 -34 -85 30.6% -0.89 4–8 (33%) 6–12 (33%) — -0.45 2018 1745 126.0 +1.66 -1.18 1.046 50.5% -2 — +164 56.8% +0.20 3–4 (43%) 8–2 (80%) — +1.42
26 2016 1784 143.3 +0.54 +0.57 1.018 50.3% +5 -104 -264 42.7% -0.23 4–8 (33%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.92 2019 1621 132.2 -3.23 -3.79 0.733 45.7% +73 -101 +197 34.0% -1.08 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.65
27 2017 1856 152.0 +1.05 -0.70 0.994 50.1% -7 -109 -333 47.3% -0.08 8–8 (50%) 11–18 (38%) — -1.13 2020 1590 103.5 -0.93 -0.44 0.755 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03
28 2018 1857 148.2 +0.47 -0.42 0.985 49.9% -17 -133 -246 49.6% -0.05 9–10 (47%) 15–14 (52%) — -0.96 2021 1608 104.1 -1.59 +0.30 0.788 46.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09
29 2019 1884 157.4 +2.72 +1.70 1.113 51.5% -64 +3 -176 54.2% +0.38 10–10 (50%) 13–15 (46%) — -2.42 2022 1577 102.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 1821 155.2 +0.74 +0.67 1.021 50.2% +13 -16 — 47.0% -0.03 3–5 (38%) 4–7 (36%) — -1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 1766 144.6 -0.12 -0.04 0.974 49.4% -30 +102 -91 47.6% -0.24 6–10 (38%) 12–11 (52%) — -0.32 2024 1563 98.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1677 122.0 +0.37 -2.56 0.912 48.2% -3 — -65 33.3% -0.61 2–4 (33%) 1–7 (13%) — -0.69 2025 1593 108.5 -0.49 -2.98 0.826 46.7% — — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — -0.04
33 2023 1807 145.1 +1.27 -0.07 1.005 50.1% -83 +104 -90 51.6% +0.11 10–8 (56%) 11–11 (50%) — -0.08 2026 1574 107.6 -0.90 +0.99 1.034 51.0% +27 — — 66.7% +1.00 — — — +0.24
34 2024 1883 151.8 +3.06 +1.41 1.121 51.7% -174 +103 -53 58.6% +0.42 8–10 (44%) 25–16 (61%) — -2.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1823 139.7 -0.04 -0.88 0.935 48.5% -52 +32 -3 42.1% -0.60 5–4 (56%) 7–10 (41%) — -2.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 1794 128.3 -0.48 -1.66 0.905 48.5% -139 +3 +121 45.0% -0.49 7–6 (54%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2001 149.8 +0.84 -0.04 1.003 50.0% -39 -4 -94 47.2% -0.13 84–96 (47%) 127–150 (46%) 98.2 -3.01 — 1973 147.3 +0.35 -1.82 0.915 48.9% +19 -225 +90 49.9% -0.13 59–53 (53%) 98–89 (52%) 105.0 +0.30

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.