H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Jan-Lennard Struff vs Feliciano Lopez H2H: 2-1

Jan-Lennard Struff holds a 2–1 lead over Feliciano Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Jan-Lennard Struff leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jan-Lennard Struff won the 2018 Antwerp round of 16 6-1 3-6 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jan-Lennard Struff
Germany Age 36 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Feliciano Lopez
ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Feliciano Lopez #71 6-3 6-7(2) 7-6(5) Jan-Lennard Struff #59 Match data Oct 29, 2018 Q1 Q Paris Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Jan-Lennard Struff #58 6-1 3-6 7-6(3) Feliciano Lopez #70 Match data Oct 19, 2018* R16 Antwerp ATP 250 Hard
Jan-Lennard Struff #96 6-3 6-4 Feliciano Lopez #30 Match data May 1, 2014* R32 Munich Open ATP 250 Clay
Feliciano Lopez #31 7-5 6-3 Jan-Lennard Struff #105 Match data Jul 18, 2013* R32 Hamburg Open ATP 500 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jan-Lennard Struff #44 #21 1,628 2,001 230 267 46.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Feliciano Lopez #672 #12 2,415 2,010 501 479 51.1% 0 0 0 3 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jan-Lennard Struff Feliciano Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #546 1,491 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #271 1,480 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2001 2–5 28.6% #159 1,520 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2002 18–16 52.9% #62 1,697 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2003 34–31 52.3% #28 1,840 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2004 32–25 56.1% #25 1,842 0 1
23 2013 4–9 30.8% #107 1,585 0 0 2005 31–26 54.4% #33 1,759 0 1
24 2014 15–17 46.9% #59 1,721 0 0 2006 19–28 40.4% #79 1,675 0 1
25 2015 4–18 18.2% #107 1,625 0 0 2007 27–24 52.9% #35 1,803 0 1
26 2016 11–18 37.9% #63 1,784 0 0 2008 23–24 48.9% #30 1,832 0 1
27 2017 27–28 49.1% #53 1,856 0 0 2009 17–23 42.5% #47 1,725 0 1
28 2018 23–24 48.9% #57 1,856 0 0 2010 27–23 54.0% #32 1,801 0 2
29 2019 34–27 55.7% #35 1,883 0 0 2011 35–25 58.3% #20 1,968 0 2
30 2020 11–14 44.0% #36 1,821 0 0 2012 26–27 49.1% #40 1,857 0 2
31 2021 23–27 46.0% #51 1,765 0 0 2013 30–20 60.0% #28 1,914 0 3
32 2022 3–10 23.1% #150 1,677 0 0 2014 40–25 61.5% #14 1,947 0 4
33 2023 20–17 54.1% #25 1,806 0 0 2015 32–26 55.2% #17 1,942 0 4
34 2024 28–21 57.1% #42 1,883 0 1 2016 29–24 54.7% #28 1,888 0 5
35 2025 14–21 40.0% #83 1,822 0 1 2017 25–24 51.0% #36 1,902 0 6
36 2026 13–16 44.8% #44 1,787 0 1 2018 22–21 51.2% #64 1,806 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2019 13–15 46.4% #62 1,807 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2020 7–10 41.2% #64 1,756 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2021 9–20 31.0% #106 1,593 0 7
40 — — — — — — — 2022 0–11 0.0% #830 1,468 0 7
41 — — — — — — — 2023 3–4 42.9% #468 1,517 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jan-Lennard Struff Feliciano Lopez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 14 14 28 50.0% 13 10 23 56.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 17 12 29 58.6% 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2005 18 14 32 56.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2014 9 8 17 52.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2006 9 16 25 36.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 2015 4 8 12 33.3% 0 7 7 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2007 20 15 35 57.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2016 7 9 16 43.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2008 17 17 34 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
27 2017 16 15 31 51.6% 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2009 11 15 26 42.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2018 13 13 26 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2010 15 15 30 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
29 2019 17 17 34 50.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2011 17 15 32 53.1% 13 8 21 61.9% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
30 2020 10 11 21 47.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 15 16 31 48.4% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
31 2021 11 16 27 40.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2013 15 13 28 53.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
32 2022 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2014 22 16 38 57.9% 6 7 13 46.2% 12 2 14 85.7% — — — —
33 2023 6 10 16 37.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2015 20 14 34 58.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
34 2024 7 12 19 36.8% 15 6 21 71.4% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2016 16 14 30 53.3% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
35 2025 8 11 19 42.1% 3 7 10 30.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2017 8 15 23 34.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
36 2026 3 9 12 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2018 12 12 24 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 7 10 17 41.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2 10 12 16.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
Career — 114 148 262 43.5% 82 82 164 50.0% 34 37 71 47.9% — — — — — 272 277 549 49.5% 130 137 267 48.7% 89 53 142 62.7% 10 12 22 45.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 489/498 of Jan-Lennard Struff's and 957/979 of Feliciano Lopez's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jan-Lennard Struff Feliciano Lopez
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 1/1 0.0 0.0 73.0% 37.0% 50.0% 28.6% 0.0% 40.5% 34.0%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 7/7 5.6 2.9 59.3% 66.9% 49.1% 54.8% 43.7% 59.4% 35.1%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 30/34 9.7 4.3 60.4% 73.0% 48.8% 58.0% 42.1% 63.4% 30.5%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 61/65 8.1 3.3 58.2% 74.6% 52.4% 67.5% 43.8% 65.3% 33.3%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 54/57 10.3 3.6 57.2% 77.2% 51.9% 62.9% 40.9% 66.4% 32.3%
23 2013 13/13 6.5 4.1 61.6% 71.3% 49.5% 45.8% 36.0% 62.6% 37.0% 2005 57/57 8.6 3.3 59.8% 75.5% 50.0% 64.7% 36.1% 65.3% 32.9%
24 2014 32/32 6.2 2.3 58.5% 73.9% 51.7% 59.7% 39.0% 64.5% 35.9% 2006 47/47 9.9 3.6 57.2% 75.3% 48.3% 55.3% 36.9% 63.9% 33.4%
25 2015 22/22 9.3 4.8 59.2% 75.0% 45.5% 55.1% 37.8% 62.7% 32.6% 2007 51/51 10.0 3.5 59.7% 75.5% 52.4% 57.9% 40.5% 66.1% 32.9%
26 2016 28/29 7.2 4.5 52.7% 76.8% 50.3% 54.3% 39.2% 64.3% 36.3% 2008 47/47 11.8 3.2 60.1% 75.7% 54.2% 66.9% 41.9% 66.9% 32.1%
27 2017 55/55 8.3 4.3 53.2% 77.9% 50.3% 63.5% 39.5% 65.0% 34.8% 2009 39/40 9.7 2.7 59.1% 73.5% 50.3% 61.4% 41.0% 64.2% 32.2%
28 2018 47/47 10.3 4.3 56.2% 76.6% 48.5% 58.8% 46.1% 64.2% 35.2% 2010 49/50 10.5 3.3 57.4% 77.3% 50.8% 63.1% 37.8% 65.9% 32.3%
29 2019 61/61 11.0 2.8 55.8% 79.2% 51.8% 65.6% 39.6% 67.3% 36.4% 2011 60/60 12.2 3.7 57.6% 77.2% 53.7% 64.7% 36.4% 67.2% 32.7%
30 2020 25/25 8.9 2.9 55.4% 75.8% 47.9% 64.2% 32.8% 63.3% 37.5% 2012 50/53 9.9 3.4 56.6% 76.1% 51.1% 66.1% 38.5% 65.3% 32.4%
31 2021 47/50 9.2 4.0 55.5% 74.0% 47.9% 55.8% 33.9% 62.4% 36.6% 2013 49/50 11.1 3.6 58.9% 74.8% 53.2% 68.2% 39.1% 66.2% 33.8%
32 2022 13/13 10.5 3.8 57.3% 75.3% 49.0% 55.4% 34.9% 64.1% 32.8% 2014 64/65 10.0 3.1 59.5% 77.2% 52.4% 64.0% 36.1% 67.2% 32.4%
33 2023 37/37 9.7 3.6 58.6% 75.2% 50.5% 64.9% 44.3% 65.2% 34.9% 2015 58/58 12.7 3.6 57.3% 76.5% 53.6% 66.4% 33.4% 66.8% 34.1%
34 2024 46/49 10.0 4.4 57.9% 77.6% 52.3% 65.0% 35.8% 66.9% 37.1% 2016 53/53 11.0 3.2 57.8% 77.8% 51.5% 63.1% 38.5% 66.5% 35.4%
35 2025 34/35 9.4 3.5 58.6% 74.1% 49.2% 50.2% 30.1% 63.6% 34.0% 2017 48/49 10.8 2.9 59.5% 77.0% 51.4% 64.1% 38.3% 66.5% 32.8%
36 2026 29/30 11.1 4.2 57.7% 72.9% 48.8% 62.0% 35.6% 62.8% 34.1% 2018 42/43 11.8 3.1 60.9% 76.5% 48.6% 63.3% 39.5% 65.4% 32.2%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 26/28 12.9 4.2 56.7% 76.5% 51.9% 66.8% 36.0% 66.0% 31.5%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 17/17 14.2 5.1 53.7% 79.3% 47.9% 70.8% 37.0% 64.8% 31.2%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 29/29 10.4 4.8 55.1% 77.3% 50.8% 53.0% 43.1% 65.2% 30.2%
40 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 11/11 9.4 5.6 51.6% 74.1% 39.5% 56.6% 18.7% 57.1% 29.2%
41 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 7/7 10.4 4.4 54.3% 76.6% 52.7% 65.7% 26.4% 65.9% 29.1%
Career — 489/498 9.3 3.8 56.6% 76.0% 49.8% 60.0% 38.1% 64.6% 35.6% — 957/980 10.5 3.5 58.2% 76.0% 51.4% 63.4% 38.4% 65.7% 32.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jan-Lennard Struff Feliciano Lopez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1491 95.8 +0.71 -0.39 0.571 36.7% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.03
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1480 100.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.09
19 2009 1452 96.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1520 116.2 -0.46 -2.22 0.863 47.5% — +31 — 38.9% -0.78 0–3 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 98.5 +0.17
20 2010 1437 107.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1698 127.3 +1.48 -5.32 0.834 47.5% -42 -107 -65 47.5% -0.35 13–4 (76%) 10–8 (56%) 114.4 +0.51
21 2011 1417 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1841 141.9 +3.32 -2.91 0.959 49.6% -82 -104 -140 51.6% -0.01 11–11 (50%) 20–17 (54%) 105.0 -2.29
22 2012 1380 96.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1843 141.1 +3.06 -2.87 0.962 49.6% -4 -87 -139 53.5% +0.07 12–9 (57%) 13–16 (45%) 100.2 +0.64
23 2013 1586 121.5 -1.23 +0.31 0.991 49.6% -69 -29 +15 38.9% -0.39 1–2 (33%) 1–7 (13%) 94.5 +0.50 2005 1760 138.7 +2.28 -3.17 0.949 49.1% -15 -35 +85 52.0% -0.07 13–7 (65%) 18–15 (55%) 103.7 -0.87
24 2014 1722 139.8 +0.16 -0.05 1.012 50.3% -12 -77 -156 40.3% -0.42 7–3 (70%) 3–8 (27%) 103.7 -0.72 2006 1676 133.5 +1.55 -2.92 0.925 48.9% -40 +59 +97 41.8% -0.47 9–9 (50%) 11–13 (46%) 98.3 -1.61
25 2015 1625 133.3 -1.42 -2.36 0.872 47.8% +51 -34 -85 30.6% -0.89 4–8 (33%) 6–12 (33%) 94.6 -0.45 2007 1803 144.0 +3.00 -2.42 0.971 49.7% -12 -87 -39 52.6% -0.04 8–10 (44%) 21–14 (60%) 104.0 -1.68
26 2016 1784 143.3 +0.54 +0.57 1.018 50.3% +5 -104 -264 42.7% -0.23 4–8 (33%) 8–5 (62%) 101.5 -0.92 2008 1832 150.3 +3.61 -2.59 0.970 49.7% +8 -169 +26 50.4% -0.12 6–10 (38%) 17–8 (68%) 103.6 -1.42
27 2017 1856 152.0 +1.05 -0.70 0.994 50.1% -7 -109 -333 47.3% -0.08 8–8 (50%) 11–18 (38%) 97.7 -1.13 2009 1726 141.9 +1.43 -2.88 0.900 48.4% +26 -48 +98 47.2% -0.30 7–11 (39%) 13–9 (59%) 100.2 -0.15
28 2018 1857 148.2 +0.47 -0.42 0.985 49.9% -17 -133 -246 49.6% -0.05 9–10 (47%) 15–14 (52%) 100.8 -0.96 2010 1802 148.0 +2.32 -2.85 0.948 49.5% -6 -112 +49 50.0% -0.03 6–2 (75%) 13–13 (50%) 104.4 +0.29
29 2019 1884 157.4 +2.72 +1.70 1.113 51.5% -64 +3 -176 54.2% +0.38 10–10 (50%) 13–15 (46%) 99.8 -2.42 2011 1969 161.7 +4.60 -2.41 0.997 49.9% -64 -112 +32 55.2% +0.10 12–10 (55%) 28–17 (62%) 111.3 -3.54
30 2020 1821 155.2 +0.74 +0.67 1.021 50.2% +13 -16 — 47.0% -0.03 3–5 (38%) 4–7 (36%) 97.0 -1.42 2012 1858 151.5 +1.97 -3.28 0.934 49.0% +2 -55 +79 48.8% +0.13 10–5 (67%) 14–25 (36%) 96.1 -1.11
31 2021 1766 144.6 -0.12 -0.04 0.974 49.4% -30 +102 -91 47.6% -0.24 6–10 (38%) 12–11 (52%) 95.8 -0.32 2013 1915 149.8 +2.60 -1.97 0.997 50.1% -40 -64 +140 53.7% +0.07 9–6 (60%) 14–10 (58%) 105.2 -0.06
32 2022 1677 122.0 +0.37 -2.56 0.912 48.2% -3 — -65 33.3% -0.61 2–4 (33%) 1–7 (13%) 93.2 -0.69 2014 1948 155.3 +3.04 -2.60 0.987 49.8% -17 -179 +209 55.8% +0.15 14–3 (82%) 22–19 (54%) 109.9 +2.25
33 2023 1807 145.1 +1.27 -0.07 1.005 50.1% -83 +104 -90 51.6% +0.11 10–8 (56%) 11–11 (50%) 103.8 -0.08 2015 1943 158.0 +2.20 -0.75 1.029 50.3% +56 -176 +79 54.8% +0.18 12–13 (48%) 26–15 (63%) 102.1 +2.95
34 2024 1883 151.8 +3.06 +1.41 1.121 51.7% -174 +103 -53 58.6% +0.42 8–10 (44%) 25–16 (61%) 105.0 -2.74 2016 1889 154.0 +2.36 -0.30 1.055 50.8% +25 -36 +78 54.5% +0.23 10–10 (50%) 20–15 (57%) 102.4 +1.68
35 2025 1823 139.7 -0.04 -0.88 0.935 48.5% -52 +32 -3 42.1% -0.60 5–4 (56%) 7–10 (41%) 101.1 -2.29 2017 1903 154.4 +2.94 -2.24 0.978 49.7% -97 -32 +126 51.2% +0.07 11–10 (52%) 16–15 (52%) 99.6 -1.42
36 2026 1787 129.2 -0.48 -1.25 0.918 48.8% -127 +10 +129 46.6% -0.41 7–7 (50%) 10–9 (53%) 99.9 -1.10 2018 1806 142.4 +1.63 -2.71 0.932 49.0% -27 +12 +191 44.6% -0.49 10–4 (71%) 13–9 (59%) 107.5 +0.44
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1808 139.4 +1.43 -2.84 0.926 48.8% -26 -93 +213 47.3% -0.08 7–5 (58%) 9–13 (41%) 99.1 -1.25
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1756 143.9 +1.90 -3.41 0.888 48.9% +5 -63 — 40.9% -0.45 3–3 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 100.8 -1.13
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1593 125.8 +0.90 -5.11 0.867 47.8% +32 +34 +333 36.8% -0.80 2–9 (18%) 8–7 (53%) 90.3 +0.52
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1468 99.6 -3.78 -3.84 0.681 43.1% +58 — +305 14.3% -2.43 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 96.8 +0.10
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1517 114.8 +0.13 -1.94 0.853 48.1% — — +211 43.8% -0.87 1–1 3–3 (50%) — -0.06
Career — 2001 149.8 +0.84 -0.02 1.004 50.0% -39 -3 -93 47.3% -0.12 84–97 (46%) 127–150 (46%) 98.0 -2.98 — 2011 152.3 +2.42 -2.62 0.953 49.3% -16 -72 +109 49.9% -0.11 186–158 (54%) 319–269 (54%) 107.2 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.