H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Jan-Lennard Struff vs Feliciano Lopez H2H: 2-1

Jan-Lennard Struff holds a 2–1 lead over Feliciano Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Jan-Lennard Struff leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jan-Lennard Struff won the 2018 Antwerp fourth round 6-1 3-6 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jan-Lennard Struff
Germany Age 36 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Feliciano Lopez
ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 29, 2018 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Q1 Q Hard Feliciano Lopez #71 6-3 6-7(2) 7-6(5) Jan-Lennard Struff #59 Match data
Oct 19, 2018* Antwerp ATP 250 R16 Hard Jan-Lennard Struff #58 6-1 3-6 7-6(3) Feliciano Lopez #70 Match data
May 1, 2014* Munich ATP 250 R32 Clay Jan-Lennard Struff #96 6-3 6-4 Feliciano Lopez #30 Match data
Jul 18, 2013* Hamburg ATP 500 R32 Clay Feliciano Lopez #31 7-5 6-3 Jan-Lennard Struff #105 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jan-Lennard Struff #41 #21 1,628 2,001 225 261 46.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Feliciano Lopez #672 #12 2,415 2,013 497 477 51.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jan-Lennard Struff Feliciano Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #546 1,491 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #271 1,480 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2001 2–5 28.6% #159 1,520 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2002 18–16 52.9% #62 1,699 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2003 34–31 52.3% #28 1,841 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2004 30–24 55.6% #25 1,833 0 1
23 2013 4–9 30.8% #107 1,585 0 0 2005 31–26 54.4% #33 1,759 0 1
24 2014 15–17 46.9% #59 1,719 0 0 2006 19–28 40.4% #79 1,676 0 1
25 2015 4–18 18.2% #107 1,624 0 0 2007 27–24 52.9% #35 1,804 0 1
26 2016 11–17 39.3% #63 1,792 0 0 2008 23–24 48.9% #30 1,829 0 1
27 2017 27–28 49.1% #53 1,855 0 0 2009 17–23 42.5% #47 1,724 0 1
28 2018 23–24 48.9% #57 1,857 0 0 2010 27–23 54.0% #32 1,807 0 2
29 2019 34–27 55.7% #35 1,884 0 0 2011 35–25 58.3% #20 1,968 0 2
30 2020 11–14 44.0% #36 1,822 0 0 2012 24–26 48.0% #40 1,844 0 2
31 2021 22–26 45.8% #51 1,762 0 0 2013 30–20 60.0% #28 1,914 0 3
32 2022 3–10 23.1% #150 1,675 0 0 2014 40–25 61.5% #14 1,950 0 4
33 2023 20–17 54.1% #25 1,805 0 0 2015 32–26 55.2% #17 1,943 0 4
34 2024 27–20 57.4% #42 1,868 0 1 2016 29–24 54.7% #28 1,890 0 5
35 2025 14–22 38.9% #83 1,813 0 1 2017 25–24 51.0% #36 1,900 0 6
36 2026 10–12 45.5% #41 1,827 0 1 2018 22–21 51.2% #64 1,817 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2019 13–15 46.4% #62 1,824 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2020 7–10 41.2% #64 1,763 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2021 9–20 31.0% #106 1,595 0 7
40 — — — — — — — 2022 0–11 0.0% #830 1,468 0 7
41 — — — — — — — 2023 3–4 42.9% #468 1,517 0 7