H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Jan-Lennard Struff vs Guillermo Garcia-Lopez H2H: 1-1

Jan-Lennard Struff and Guillermo Garcia-Lopez are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez won the 2015 Miami Open second round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jan-Lennard Struff
Germany Age 36 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #25 6-4 6-4 Jan-Lennard Struff #72 Match data Mar 28, 2015* R64 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Jan-Lennard Struff #52 6-3 6-4 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #39 Match data Oct 16, 2014* R32 Vienna Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jan-Lennard Struff #44 #21 1,628 2,001 230 267 46.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,939 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jan-Lennard Struff Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0
23 2013 4–9 30.8% #107 1,585 0 0 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,596 0 0
24 2014 15–17 46.9% #59 1,721 0 0 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,527 0 0
25 2015 4–18 18.2% #107 1,625 0 0 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,634 0 0
26 2016 11–18 37.9% #63 1,784 0 0 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,758 0 1
27 2017 27–28 49.1% #53 1,856 0 0 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,873 0 2
28 2018 23–24 48.9% #57 1,856 0 0 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2
29 2019 34–27 55.7% #35 1,883 0 0 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,718 0 2
30 2020 11–14 44.0% #36 1,821 0 0 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2
31 2021 23–27 46.0% #51 1,765 0 0 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,741 0 3
32 2022 3–10 23.1% #150 1,677 0 0 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,843 0 5
33 2023 20–17 54.1% #25 1,806 0 0 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,685 0 5
34 2024 28–21 57.1% #42 1,883 0 1 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,746 0 5
35 2025 14–21 40.0% #83 1,822 0 1 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,676 0 5
36 2026 13–16 44.8% #44 1,787 0 1 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,695 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jan-Lennard Struff Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 5 8 13 38.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2014 9 8 17 52.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2007 7 9 16 43.8% 4 10 14 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2015 4 8 12 33.3% 0 7 7 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2008 12 13 25 48.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2016 7 9 16 43.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2009 12 16 28 42.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
27 2017 16 15 31 51.6% 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 12 8 20 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
28 2018 13 13 26 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2011 11 17 28 39.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2019 17 17 34 50.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2020 10 11 21 47.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 11 10 21 52.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
31 2021 11 16 27 40.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
32 2022 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2015 20 16 36 55.6% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
33 2023 6 10 16 37.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2016 9 18 27 33.3% 12 10 22 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
34 2024 7 12 19 36.8% 15 6 21 71.4% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2017 3 9 12 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — —
35 2025 8 11 19 42.1% 3 7 10 30.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2018 3 9 12 25.0% 10 11 21 47.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
36 2026 3 9 12 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2019 5 7 12 41.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 114 148 262 43.5% 82 82 164 50.0% 34 37 71 47.9% — — — — — 133 181 314 42.4% 136 138 274 49.6% 29 31 60 48.3% 1 3 4 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 489/498 of Jan-Lennard Struff's and 650/652 of Guillermo Garcia-Lopez's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jan-Lennard Struff Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/1 6.0 1.0 49.4% 68.4% 43.6% 72.7% 100.0% 55.8% 33.3%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 12/12 2.3 2.7 60.3% 65.8% 47.8% 45.3% 51.7% 58.8% 38.2%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 45/45 2.6 3.4 64.8% 65.4% 47.4% 56.8% 44.2% 59.3% 39.1%
23 2013 13/13 6.5 4.1 61.6% 71.3% 49.5% 45.8% 36.0% 62.6% 37.0% 2006 35/35 4.3 3.6 60.5% 66.9% 48.1% 55.6% 38.0% 59.4% 37.7%
24 2014 32/32 6.2 2.3 58.5% 73.9% 51.7% 59.7% 39.0% 64.5% 35.9% 2007 35/35 3.0 2.4 63.4% 67.6% 45.5% 53.1% 46.7% 59.5% 36.9%
25 2015 22/22 9.3 4.8 59.2% 75.0% 45.5% 55.1% 37.8% 62.7% 32.6% 2008 43/44 2.7 4.7 59.5% 66.3% 47.2% 56.1% 39.1% 58.4% 36.9%
26 2016 28/29 7.2 4.5 52.7% 76.8% 50.3% 54.3% 39.2% 64.3% 36.3% 2009 55/55 3.0 4.7 61.0% 68.6% 48.2% 54.7% 42.0% 60.8% 39.4%
27 2017 55/55 8.3 4.3 53.2% 77.9% 50.3% 63.5% 39.5% 65.0% 34.8% 2010 54/54 4.6 3.4 60.4% 71.3% 52.9% 53.6% 43.9% 63.7% 38.7%
28 2018 47/47 10.3 4.3 56.2% 76.6% 48.5% 58.8% 46.1% 64.2% 35.2% 2011 49/49 3.7 4.7 56.4% 68.9% 47.6% 50.9% 44.4% 59.8% 36.8%
29 2019 61/61 11.0 2.8 55.8% 79.2% 51.8% 65.6% 39.6% 67.3% 36.4% 2012 45/45 3.6 4.1 57.7% 67.9% 49.7% 61.6% 41.6% 59.8% 37.7%
30 2020 25/25 8.9 2.9 55.4% 75.8% 47.9% 64.2% 32.8% 63.3% 37.5% 2013 41/41 3.4 4.6 55.2% 70.1% 47.3% 56.2% 41.7% 59.9% 38.0%
31 2021 47/50 9.2 4.0 55.5% 74.0% 47.9% 55.8% 33.9% 62.4% 36.6% 2014 51/51 3.6 3.8 57.3% 69.0% 48.2% 53.9% 42.7% 60.0% 39.0%
32 2022 13/13 10.5 3.8 57.3% 75.3% 49.0% 55.4% 34.9% 64.1% 32.8% 2015 56/57 4.9 3.8 54.9% 73.3% 49.6% 57.4% 44.8% 62.9% 38.7%
33 2023 37/37 9.7 3.6 58.6% 75.2% 50.5% 64.9% 44.3% 65.2% 34.9% 2016 53/53 4.0 3.9 56.2% 71.2% 49.3% 57.5% 36.2% 61.5% 36.1%
34 2024 46/49 10.0 4.4 57.9% 77.6% 52.3% 65.0% 35.8% 66.9% 37.1% 2017 20/20 3.1 4.4 54.7% 67.9% 46.4% 56.8% 39.8% 58.1% 33.4%
35 2025 34/35 9.4 3.5 58.6% 74.1% 49.2% 50.2% 30.1% 63.6% 34.0% 2018 39/39 3.5 4.6 60.5% 70.9% 50.0% 55.4% 43.0% 62.5% 35.8%
36 2026 29/30 11.1 4.2 57.7% 72.9% 48.8% 62.0% 35.6% 62.8% 34.1% 2019 16/16 4.4 2.9 61.1% 68.8% 52.7% 63.4% 29.0% 62.6% 31.0%
Career — 489/498 9.3 3.8 56.6% 76.0% 49.8% 60.0% 38.1% 64.6% 35.6% — 650/652 3.6 4.0 58.8% 69.1% 48.7% 55.7% 42.1% 60.6% 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jan-Lennard Struff Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2009 1452 96.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 1437 107.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1498 111.0 +3.10 +2.69 0.755 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.27
21 2011 1417 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1578 124.3 -0.99 +0.39 0.927 48.8% -53 +76 — 40.0% -0.23 2–0 0–1 — -0.99
22 2012 1380 96.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1589 131.8 -2.50 +1.29 0.960 49.2% -21 +56 -7 44.5% -0.20 4–7 (36%) 4–10 (29%) 94.5 -0.39
23 2013 1586 121.5 -1.23 +0.31 0.991 49.6% -69 -29 +15 38.9% -0.39 1–2 (33%) 1–7 (13%) 94.5 +0.50 2006 1597 134.1 -2.17 +0.28 0.929 48.6% -13 +48 — 43.2% -0.39 5–6 (45%) 10–8 (56%) 99.7 -0.42
24 2014 1722 139.8 +0.16 -0.05 1.012 50.3% -12 -77 -156 40.3% -0.42 7–3 (70%) 3–8 (27%) 103.7 -0.72 2007 1527 127.2 -3.31 +0.34 0.910 48.2% +38 +53 +43 42.0% -0.61 3–9 (25%) 4–8 (33%) 90.4 +0.03
25 2015 1625 133.3 -1.42 -2.36 0.872 47.8% +51 -34 -85 30.6% -0.89 4–8 (33%) 6–12 (33%) 94.6 -0.45 2008 1634 132.3 -3.43 +0.38 0.889 48.0% -30 +18 -10 47.4% -0.38 8–7 (53%) 9–7 (56%) 103.1 -0.38
26 2016 1784 143.3 +0.54 +0.57 1.018 50.3% +5 -104 -264 42.7% -0.23 4–8 (33%) 8–5 (62%) 101.5 -0.92 2009 1759 139.8 -1.99 +2.17 1.006 50.0% -99 -39 -12 48.9% +0.11 10–5 (67%) 8–13 (38%) 104.1 -0.24
27 2017 1856 152.0 +1.05 -0.70 0.994 50.1% -7 -109 -333 47.3% -0.08 8–8 (50%) 11–18 (38%) 97.7 -1.13 2010 1874 147.0 +0.64 +2.00 1.065 51.1% -42 -94 -140 51.9% +0.08 14–8 (64%) 14–11 (56%) 106.3 +0.40
28 2018 1857 148.2 +0.47 -0.42 0.985 49.9% -17 -133 -246 49.6% -0.05 9–10 (47%) 15–14 (52%) 100.8 -0.96 2011 1712 143.0 -2.34 -0.22 0.914 48.3% +34 +15 -20 44.0% -0.48 6–9 (40%) 10–12 (45%) 94.5 +1.22
29 2019 1884 157.4 +2.72 +1.70 1.113 51.5% -64 +3 -176 54.2% +0.38 10–10 (50%) 13–15 (46%) 99.8 -2.42 2012 1718 140.5 -2.47 -0.31 0.939 49.1% -19 +58 -5 43.0% -0.45 11–7 (61%) 7–6 (54%) 103.3 +0.76
30 2020 1821 155.2 +0.74 +0.67 1.021 50.2% +13 -16 — 47.0% -0.03 3–5 (38%) 4–7 (36%) 97.0 -1.42 2013 1775 141.6 -3.07 +1.15 0.948 48.9% -63 +53 -70 45.2% -0.29 11–5 (69%) 7–7 (50%) 107.6 -0.86
31 2021 1766 144.6 -0.12 -0.04 0.974 49.4% -30 +102 -91 47.6% -0.24 6–10 (38%) 12–11 (52%) 95.8 -0.32 2014 1742 146.7 -2.36 +2.20 0.975 49.5% -25 +136 — 47.8% -0.14 13–12 (52%) 7–13 (35%) 95.1 +0.50
32 2022 1677 122.0 +0.37 -2.56 0.912 48.2% -3 — -65 33.3% -0.61 2–4 (33%) 1–7 (13%) 93.2 -0.69 2015 1843 154.3 -0.73 +2.76 1.044 50.6% -3 +36 -237 55.3% +0.38 9–10 (47%) 12–14 (46%) 99.6 +1.68
33 2023 1807 145.1 +1.27 -0.07 1.005 50.1% -83 +104 -90 51.6% +0.11 10–8 (56%) 11–11 (50%) 103.8 -0.08 2016 1686 149.0 -1.75 -0.29 0.939 48.9% -11 +191 -102 44.3% -0.37 5–9 (36%) 18–9 (67%) 98.9 -0.19
34 2024 1883 151.8 +3.06 +1.41 1.121 51.7% -174 +103 -53 58.6% +0.42 8–10 (44%) 25–16 (61%) 105.0 -2.74 2017 1746 137.8 -4.47 -1.59 0.796 46.4% -36 +41 — 34.8% -0.76 0–4 (0%) 1–7 (13%) 88.6 -0.78
35 2025 1823 139.7 -0.04 -0.88 0.935 48.5% -52 +32 -3 42.1% -0.60 5–4 (56%) 7–10 (41%) 101.1 -2.29 2018 1676 140.7 -0.71 -0.60 0.954 49.0% -33 +102 -51 42.9% -0.40 7–7 (50%) 15–13 (54%) 103.9 -2.42
36 2026 1787 129.2 -0.48 -1.25 0.918 48.8% -127 +10 +130 46.6% -0.41 7–7 (50%) 10–9 (53%) 99.9 -1.10 2019 1695 124.9 -2.06 -2.71 0.827 47.5% +14 +54 — 35.0% -1.05 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 104.5 +0.54
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1608 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1586 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2001 149.8 +0.84 -0.02 1.004 50.0% -39 -3 -93 47.3% -0.12 84–97 (46%) 127–150 (46%) 98.0 -2.98 — 1940 146.0 -1.99 +0.78 0.953 49.1% -21 +54 -60 45.8% -0.25 111–106 (51%) 129–140 (48%) 99.7 -0.28

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.