H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Jan-Lennard Struff vs Juan Martin del Potro H2H: 0-2
Juan Martin del Potro holds a 2–0 lead over Jan-Lennard Struff in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Juan Martin del Potro leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Martin del Potro won the 2017 Stockholm fourth round 6-2 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 36
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 37
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2017* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Juan Martin del Potro | 6-2 7-6(6) | Jan-Lennard Struff | Match data |
| Apr 29, 2016* | Munich | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Juan Martin del Potro | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Jan-Lennard Struff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Lennard Struff | #41 | #21 | 1,628 | 2,001 | 225 | 261 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Juan Martin del Potro | #761 | #3 | 6,825 | 2,273 | 416 | 172 | 70.7% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 11 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan-Lennard Struff | Juan Martin del Potro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #92 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #44 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #9 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #5 | 2,198 | 1 | 7 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #258 | 2,117 | 1 | 7 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #11 | 2,042 | 1 | 9 |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #107 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 57–16 | 78.1% | #7 | 2,212 | 1 | 13 |
| 24 | 2014 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #59 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #5 | 2,210 | 1 | 17 |
| 25 | 2015 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #107 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #137 | 2,139 | 1 | 18 |
| 26 | 2016 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #63 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #590 | 2,093 | 1 | 18 |
| 27 | 2017 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #53 | 1,855 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 24–11 | 68.6% | #38 | 2,115 | 1 | 19 |
| 28 | 2018 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 38–17 | 69.1% | #11 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 |
| 29 | 2019 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #35 | 1,884 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 48–13 | 78.7% | #5 | 2,190 | 1 | 22 |
| 30 | 2020 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #36 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #122 | 2,096 | 1 | 22 |
| 31 | 2021 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #25 | 1,805 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #761 | 2,066 | 1 | 22 |
| 34 | 2024 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,868 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2026 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #41 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |