H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jan-Lennard Struff vs Mikhail Kukushkin H2H: 2-1

Jan-Lennard Struff holds a 2–1 lead over Mikhail Kukushkin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jan-Lennard Struff leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Mikhail Kukushkin leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jan-Lennard Struff won the 2021 Dubai Tennis Championships first round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jan-Lennard Struff
Germany Age 36 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Mikhail Kukushkin
Kazakhstan Age 38 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jan-Lennard Struff #39 6-3 6-2 Mikhail Kukushkin #104 Match data Mar 16, 2021* R64 Dubai Tennis Championships ATP 500 Hard
Mikhail Kukushkin #58 6-3 7-6(5) 4-6 7-5 Jan-Lennard Struff #33 Match data Jul 7, 2019* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Jan-Lennard Struff #48 7-6(5) 6-4 Mikhail Kukushkin #79 Match data Oct 30, 2017 Q1 Q Paris Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Jan-Lennard Struff #77 2-6 3-6 6-3 6-3 7-5 Mikhail Kukushkin #50 Match data Aug 27, 2014* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Jan-Lennard Struff #106 7-6(6) 6-2 Mikhail Kukushkin #64 Match data Jan 6, 2014 Q1 Q Sydney International ATP 250 Hard

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jan-Lennard Struff #44 #21 1,628 2,001 229 266 46.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Mikhail Kukushkin #336 #39 1,075 1,907 145 220 39.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jan-Lennard Struff Mikhail Kukushkin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #218 1,513 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2008 3–4 42.9% #148 1,593 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2009 5–6 45.5% #132 1,689 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2010 11–8 57.9% #59 1,810 0 1
23 2013 4–9 30.8% #107 1,585 0 0 2011 7–20 25.9% #91 1,658 0 1
24 2014 15–17 46.9% #59 1,721 0 0 2012 10–14 41.7% #107 1,701 0 1
25 2015 4–18 18.2% #107 1,625 0 0 2013 6–5 54.5% #67 1,779 0 1
26 2016 11–18 37.9% #63 1,784 0 0 2014 15–24 38.5% #70 1,802 0 1
27 2017 27–28 49.1% #53 1,856 0 0 2015 16–23 41.0% #65 1,753 0 1
28 2018 23–24 48.9% #57 1,856 0 0 2016 11–20 35.5% #89 1,662 0 1
29 2019 34–27 55.7% #35 1,883 0 0 2017 10–14 41.7% #74 1,734 0 1
30 2020 11–14 44.0% #36 1,821 0 0 2018 19–21 47.5% #53 1,834 0 1
31 2021 23–27 46.0% #51 1,765 0 0 2019 19–25 43.2% #67 1,796 0 1
32 2022 3–10 23.1% #150 1,677 0 0 2020 6–9 40.0% #89 1,744 0 1
33 2023 20–17 54.1% #25 1,806 0 0 2021 3–12 20.0% #182 1,608 0 1
34 2024 28–21 57.1% #42 1,883 0 1 2022 1–7 12.5% #188 1,666 0 1
35 2025 14–21 40.0% #83 1,822 0 1 2023 1–2 33.3% #264 1,662 0 1
36 2026 12–15 44.4% #44 1,794 0 1 2024 2–3 40.0% #113 1,602 0 1
37 — — — — — — — 2025 0–2 0.0% #298 1,523 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jan-Lennard Struff Mikhail Kukushkin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 10 6 16 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
23 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 5 13 18 27.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
24 2014 9 8 17 52.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2012 4 5 9 44.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
25 2015 4 8 12 33.3% 0 7 7 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2013 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2016 7 9 16 43.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 3 8 11 27.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
27 2017 16 15 31 51.6% 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2015 12 13 25 48.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
28 2018 13 13 26 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2016 8 13 21 38.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2019 17 17 34 50.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2017 7 8 15 46.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 2020 10 11 21 47.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 11 13 24 45.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
31 2021 11 16 27 40.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2019 14 15 29 48.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
32 2022 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2020 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2023 6 10 16 37.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2021 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
34 2024 7 12 19 36.8% 15 6 21 71.4% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2022 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
35 2025 8 11 19 42.1% 3 7 10 30.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 2 8 10 20.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2024 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 113 147 260 43.5% 82 82 164 50.0% 34 37 71 47.9% — — — — — 104 137 241 43.2% 27 57 84 32.1% 14 25 39 35.9% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 487/497 of Jan-Lennard Struff's and 360/365 of Mikhail Kukushkin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jan-Lennard Struff Mikhail Kukushkin
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 1/1 5.0 1.0 72.6% 77.8% 35.3% 60.0% — 66.1% 29.4%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 6/7 3.8 2.2 58.2% 67.5% 53.6% 56.7% 58.5% 61.5% 35.5%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 11/11 3.3 2.1 56.2% 65.7% 50.1% 49.8% 39.9% 58.9% 38.0%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 19/19 4.2 1.3 59.0% 67.7% 55.0% 60.8% 46.9% 62.0% 37.4%
23 2013 13/13 6.5 4.1 61.6% 71.3% 49.5% 45.8% 36.0% 62.6% 37.0% 2011 27/27 3.8 2.3 56.3% 65.1% 50.3% 56.5% 37.2% 58.5% 36.7%
24 2014 32/32 6.2 2.3 58.5% 73.9% 51.7% 59.7% 39.0% 64.5% 35.9% 2012 23/24 3.4 1.8 59.1% 61.6% 51.5% 50.2% 46.5% 57.2% 36.7%
25 2015 22/22 9.3 4.8 59.2% 75.0% 45.5% 55.1% 37.8% 62.7% 32.6% 2013 11/11 5.0 2.4 54.7% 69.8% 48.0% 49.5% 56.8% 60.0% 38.6%
26 2016 28/29 7.2 4.5 52.7% 76.8% 50.3% 54.3% 39.2% 64.3% 36.3% 2014 39/39 3.9 1.5 60.1% 68.0% 52.2% 58.5% 37.5% 61.6% 36.3%
27 2017 55/55 8.3 4.3 53.2% 77.9% 50.3% 63.5% 39.5% 65.0% 34.8% 2015 39/39 2.9 1.8 58.2% 66.6% 53.7% 54.9% 42.0% 61.0% 34.7%
28 2018 47/47 10.3 4.3 56.2% 76.6% 48.5% 58.8% 46.1% 64.2% 35.2% 2016 30/31 2.6 1.5 59.1% 64.9% 48.1% 57.1% 43.1% 57.9% 36.8%
29 2019 61/61 11.0 2.8 55.8% 79.2% 51.8% 65.6% 39.6% 67.3% 36.4% 2017 24/24 3.1 1.0 66.5% 67.3% 52.3% 60.4% 49.3% 62.0% 39.2%
30 2020 25/25 8.9 2.9 55.4% 75.8% 47.9% 64.2% 32.8% 63.3% 37.5% 2018 40/40 2.5 1.3 64.3% 66.1% 54.0% 58.7% 38.1% 61.5% 37.3%
31 2021 47/50 9.2 4.0 55.5% 74.0% 47.9% 55.8% 33.9% 62.4% 36.6% 2019 44/44 2.7 1.1 65.1% 65.6% 52.5% 61.3% 37.3% 61.0% 34.9%
32 2022 13/13 10.5 3.8 57.3% 75.3% 49.0% 55.4% 34.9% 64.1% 32.8% 2020 15/15 3.3 1.9 62.1% 63.7% 51.8% 59.5% 50.9% 59.2% 37.4%
33 2023 37/37 9.7 3.6 58.6% 75.2% 50.5% 64.9% 44.3% 65.2% 34.9% 2021 13/15 3.3 1.8 62.6% 61.9% 47.4% 47.2% 51.4% 56.4% 32.0%
34 2024 46/49 10.0 4.4 57.9% 77.6% 52.3% 65.0% 35.8% 66.9% 37.1% 2022 8/8 1.9 0.8 64.7% 61.7% 55.5% 61.7% 51.0% 59.4% 31.2%
35 2025 34/35 9.4 3.5 58.6% 74.1% 49.2% 50.2% 30.1% 63.6% 34.0% 2023 3/3 1.3 1.3 67.7% 61.8% 51.3% 59.6% 75.0% 58.1% 29.2%
36 2026 27/29 11.0 3.9 57.9% 72.6% 49.3% 61.9% 34.3% 63.0% 33.5% 2024 5/5 2.8 1.4 65.1% 65.2% 43.2% 56.2% 51.0% 57.4% 36.5%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 2/2 5.0 1.5 58.5% 61.0% 55.5% 50.0% 50.0% 58.5% 31.5%
Career — 487/497 9.3 3.8 56.6% 75.9% 49.8% 60.0% 38.0% 64.6% 35.5% — 360/365 3.2 1.6 61.0% 65.7% 51.8% 57.0% 43.2% 60.1% 36.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jan-Lennard Struff Mikhail Kukushkin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2009 1452 96.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1514 108.6 -0.19 -1.28 0.868 46.9% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.24
20 2010 1437 107.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1594 118.2 -0.73 -0.47 0.922 48.2% +4 -5 — 47.1% -0.71 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.29
21 2011 1417 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1690 125.6 -1.69 +0.10 0.925 48.7% -7 -26 — 48.1% -0.11 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.03
22 2012 1380 96.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1810 136.6 -0.27 +0.51 0.983 49.8% +39 -181 — 52.3% -0.02 4–1 (80%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.77
23 2013 1586 121.5 -1.23 +0.31 0.991 49.6% -69 -29 +15 38.9% -0.39 1–2 (33%) 1–7 (13%) — +0.50 2011 1658 131.2 -3.55 -0.42 0.885 47.7% +27 -73 -95 34.3% -0.84 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.22
24 2014 1722 139.8 +0.16 -0.05 1.012 50.3% -12 -77 -156 40.3% -0.42 7–3 (70%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.72 2012 1702 134.5 -3.20 -0.30 0.857 47.1% +46 -36 -199 47.0% -0.41 6–6 (50%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.54
25 2015 1625 133.3 -1.42 -2.36 0.872 47.8% +51 -34 -85 30.6% -0.89 4–8 (33%) 6–12 (33%) — -0.45 2013 1780 133.2 -1.06 +0.50 0.965 49.7% +42 — — 58.1% +0.03 1–3 (25%) 3–1 (75%) — +1.26
26 2016 1784 143.3 +0.54 +0.57 1.018 50.3% +5 -104 -264 42.7% -0.23 4–8 (33%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.92 2014 1803 148.2 -1.61 +0.57 0.946 48.9% +22 -199 -216 45.1% -0.23 7–9 (44%) 9–14 (39%) — -0.93
27 2017 1856 152.0 +1.05 -0.70 0.994 50.1% -7 -109 -333 47.3% -0.08 8–8 (50%) 11–18 (38%) — -1.13 2015 1753 147.7 -2.51 -0.39 0.890 48.0% +76 -207 -171 42.7% -0.43 6–5 (55%) 8–11 (42%) — -1.84
28 2018 1857 148.2 +0.47 -0.42 0.985 49.9% -17 -133 -246 49.6% -0.05 9–10 (47%) 15–14 (52%) — -0.96 2016 1662 134.2 -3.89 -0.18 0.875 47.6% +22 -74 — 39.3% -0.92 2–3 (40%) 7–5 (58%) — -0.65
29 2019 1884 157.4 +2.72 +1.70 1.113 51.5% -64 +3 -176 54.2% +0.38 10–10 (50%) 13–15 (46%) — -2.42 2017 1735 138.8 -0.98 +1.79 1.031 50.6% +23 -116 — 46.9% +0.05 0–4 (0%) 3–7 (30%) — +1.06
30 2020 1821 155.2 +0.74 +0.67 1.021 50.2% +13 -16 — 47.0% -0.03 3–5 (38%) 4–7 (36%) — -1.42 2018 1835 143.4 -1.98 +0.98 0.969 49.6% -8 -211 -150 47.5% -0.14 5–8 (38%) 11–9 (55%) — +1.10
31 2021 1766 144.6 -0.12 -0.04 0.974 49.4% -30 +102 -91 47.6% -0.24 6–10 (38%) 12–11 (52%) — -0.32 2019 1796 144.9 -2.31 -1.00 0.895 48.3% -8 -215 -34 45.3% -0.30 3–3 (50%) 8–9 (47%) — -0.34
32 2022 1677 122.0 +0.37 -2.56 0.912 48.2% -3 — -65 33.3% -0.61 2–4 (33%) 1–7 (13%) — -0.69 2020 1745 128.3 -1.83 -0.48 0.916 48.6% -28 — — 40.9% -0.39 3–2 (60%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.63
33 2023 1807 145.1 +1.27 -0.07 1.005 50.1% -83 +104 -90 51.6% +0.11 10–8 (56%) 11–11 (50%) — -0.08 2021 1608 117.2 -3.86 -3.07 0.733 44.7% +27 — — 23.7% -1.71 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.47
34 2024 1883 151.8 +3.06 +1.41 1.121 51.7% -174 +103 -53 58.6% +0.42 8–10 (44%) 25–16 (61%) — -2.74 2022 1666 132.3 -1.03 -1.64 0.769 45.6% +39 — — 20.0% -1.65 0–2 0–2 — -1.16
35 2025 1823 139.7 -0.04 -0.88 0.935 48.5% -52 +32 -3 42.1% -0.60 5–4 (56%) 7–10 (41%) — -2.29 2023 1662 110.5 -2.43 -3.27 0.697 44.5% +27 — — 50.0% +0.84 1–1 0–2 — +0.28
36 2026 1794 128.3 -0.48 -1.66 0.905 48.5% -139 +3 +121 45.0% -0.49 7–6 (54%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.16 2024 1603 111.1 -2.06 -1.03 0.855 47.6% +53 — — 36.4% -1.00 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.38
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1523 100.5 -1.47 +0.05 0.759 45.5% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — -0.03
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1502 95.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2001 149.8 +0.84 -0.04 1.003 50.0% -39 -4 -94 47.2% -0.13 84–96 (47%) 127–150 (46%) 98.2 -3.01 — 1908 141.1 -2.22 -0.11 0.908 48.3% +22 -134 -132 43.2% -0.44 43–64 (40%) 66–83 (44%) 94.8 -0.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.