H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jan-Lennard Struff vs Mikhail Youzhny H2H: 1-2
Mikhail Youzhny holds a 2–1 lead over Jan-Lennard Struff in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Mikhail Youzhny leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jan-Lennard Struff won the 2016 Antwerp third round 6-7(3) 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 36
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2016* | Antwerp | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jan-Lennard Struff | 6-7(3) 6-3 6-0 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| May 20, 2015* | Geneva | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Mikhail Youzhny | 7-6(2) 7-6(5) | Jan-Lennard Struff | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2014* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 6-1 6-4 6-2 | Jan-Lennard Struff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Lennard Struff | #41 | #21 | 1,628 | 2,001 | 225 | 261 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mikhail Youzhny | #115 | #8 | 3,500 | 2,069 | 477 | 405 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan-Lennard Struff | Mikhail Youzhny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #113 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #58 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #32 | 1,866 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #43 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #16 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #107 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #43 | 1,758 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2014 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #59 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #24 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2015 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #107 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2016 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #63 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #32 | 1,761 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2017 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #53 | 1,855 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #19 | 1,960 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2018 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2019 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #35 | 1,884 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #35 | 1,837 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2020 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #36 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 2021 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #15 | 2,016 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #48 | 1,795 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | 2023 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #25 | 1,805 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,701 | 0 | 10 |
| 34 | 2024 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,868 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #57 | 1,774 | 0 | 10 |
| 35 | 2025 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #84 | 1,679 | 0 | 10 |
| 36 | 2026 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #41 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #115 | 1,637 | 0 | 10 |