H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jan-Lennard Struff vs Nicolas Mahut H2H: 2-0
Jan-Lennard Struff holds a 2–0 lead over Nicolas Mahut in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jan-Lennard Struff leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jan-Lennard Struff won the 2016 Montpellier third round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 36
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2016* | Montpellier | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jan-Lennard Struff | 6-3 7-5 | Nicolas Mahut | Match data |
| Feb 19, 2015* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jan-Lennard Struff | 6-1 6-7(6) 7-6(1) | Nicolas Mahut | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Lennard Struff | #41 | #21 | 1,628 | 2,001 | 225 | 261 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Nicolas Mahut | #1,433 | #37 | 1,122 | 1,926 | 179 | 224 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan-Lennard Struff | Nicolas Mahut | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #216 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #269 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #94 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #131 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #107 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #134 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #59 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #107 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #63 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #94 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #53 | 1,855 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #132 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #35 | 1,884 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #80 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #36 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #108 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 17–7 | 70.8% | #50 | 1,851 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #117 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2023 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #25 | 1,805 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #71 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | 2024 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,868 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | 2025 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #103 | 1,753 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | 2026 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #41 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #190 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #194 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |