H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jan-Lennard Struff vs Paolo Lorenzi H2H: 0-1
Paolo Lorenzi holds a 1–0 lead over Jan-Lennard Struff in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paolo Lorenzi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Paolo Lorenzi won the 2016 Kitzbuhel quarterfinal 6-2 6-7(5) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 36
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2016* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Paolo Lorenzi | 6-2 6-7(5) 7-5 | Jan-Lennard Struff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Lennard Struff | #41 | #21 | 1,628 | 2,001 | 225 | 261 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Paolo Lorenzi | #1,033 | #33 | 1,223 | 1,823 | 104 | 180 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan-Lennard Struff | Paolo Lorenzi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #107 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2014 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #59 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #107 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #294 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #63 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2017 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #53 | 1,855 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #84 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #143 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #35 | 1,884 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #108 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #36 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #109 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #64 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2023 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #25 | 1,805 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2024 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,868 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | 2025 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 24–32 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | 2026 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #41 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #146 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 |