H2H data updated: 2026-07-16 19:16 UTC
Jan-Lennard Struff vs Roberto Carballes Baena H2H: 0-1
Roberto Carballes Baena holds a 1–0 lead over Jan-Lennard Struff in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Roberto Carballes Baena leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Roberto Carballes Baena won the 2015 Barcelona second round 5-7 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 36
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Spain
Age 33
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2015* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Roberto Carballes Baena | 5-7 7-5 6-2 | Jan-Lennard Struff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Lennard Struff | #41 | #21 | 1,628 | 2,001 | 225 | 261 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Roberto Carballes Baena | #165 | #49 | 1,071 | 1,798 | 129 | 165 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan-Lennard Struff | Roberto Carballes Baena | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #131 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #107 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #59 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #106 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #107 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #73 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2016 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #63 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #80 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2017 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #53 | 1,855 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #97 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2018 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #79 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2019 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #35 | 1,884 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2020 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #36 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2021 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #57 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #129 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2023 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #25 | 1,805 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2024 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,868 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2026 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #41 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |