H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jan-Lennard Struff vs Thomas Fabbiano H2H: 1-0
Jan-Lennard Struff holds a 1–0 lead over Thomas Fabbiano in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan-Lennard Struff leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jan-Lennard Struff won the 2017 St. Petersburg fourth round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 36
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2017* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jan-Lennard Struff | 6-1 6-4 | Thomas Fabbiano | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Lennard Struff | #41 | #21 | 1,628 | 2,001 | 225 | 261 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Thomas Fabbiano | #1,768 | #70 | 715 | 1,748 | 27 | 62 | 30.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan-Lennard Struff | Thomas Fabbiano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #371 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #107 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2014 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #59 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #107 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2016 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #63 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #53 | 1,855 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #124 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #73 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #35 | 1,884 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #36 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #114 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2023 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #25 | 1,805 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2024 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,868 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2026 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #41 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |