H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 02:15 UTC
Jan-Lennard Struff vs Tommy Haas H2H: 2-0
Jan-Lennard Struff holds a 2–0 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jan-Lennard Struff leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Jan-Lennard Struff won the 2017 Kitzbuhel third round 6-3 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 36
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 48
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2017* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jan-Lennard Struff | 6-3 7-6(4) | Tommy Haas | Match data |
| May 5, 2017* | Munich | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Jan-Lennard Struff | 6-4 7-5 | Tommy Haas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Lennard Struff | #41 | #21 | 1,628 | 2,001 | 225 | 261 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tommy Haas | #616 | #2 | 3,030 | 2,103 | 533 | 330 | 61.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan-Lennard Struff | Tommy Haas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #170 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #45 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #34 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #23 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #107 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #8 | 2,009 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2014 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #59 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,849 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2015 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #107 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2016 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #63 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #17 | 1,909 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2017 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #53 | 1,855 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,766 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2018 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #11 | 1,893 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2019 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #35 | 1,884 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #12 | 1,892 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2020 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #36 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #82 | 1,855 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 2021 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 12 |
| 32 | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #372 | 1,844 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | 2023 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #25 | 1,805 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #205 | 1,762 | 0 | 12 |
| 34 | 2024 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,868 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,966 | 0 | 13 |
| 35 | 2025 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #12 | 2,011 | 0 | 15 |
| 36 | 2026 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #41 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #77 | 1,904 | 0 | 15 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #470 | 1,784 | 0 | 15 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #252 | 1,686 | 0 | 15 |