H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Jan-Lennard Struff vs Tommy Robredo H2H: 1-0
Jan-Lennard Struff holds a 1–0 lead over Tommy Robredo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan-Lennard Struff leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jan-Lennard Struff won the 2016 Metz third round 7-6(5) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 36
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2016* | Metz | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jan-Lennard Struff | 7-6(5) 7-5 | Tommy Robredo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Lennard Struff | #41 | #21 | 1,628 | 2,001 | 225 | 261 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tommy Robredo | #1,059 | #5 | 2,770 | 2,048 | 523 | 351 | 59.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan-Lennard Struff | Tommy Robredo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #244 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #30 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #21 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #13 | 1,823 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #107 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #19 | 1,849 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2014 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #59 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 49–26 | 65.3% | #7 | 1,868 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2015 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #107 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 48–25 | 65.8% | #10 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2016 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #63 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2017 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #53 | 1,855 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #16 | 1,903 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2018 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #50 | 1,796 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 2019 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #35 | 1,884 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 2020 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #36 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #114 | 1,752 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 2021 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 2,000 | 0 | 12 |
| 32 | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #17 | 1,998 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | 2023 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #25 | 1,805 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #42 | 1,883 | 0 | 12 |
| 34 | 2024 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,868 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #358 | 1,814 | 0 | 12 |
| 35 | 2025 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #164 | 1,740 | 0 | 12 |
| 36 | 2026 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #41 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,684 | 0 | 12 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,582 | 0 | 12 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,502 | 0 | 12 |