H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Jan-Michael Gambill vs Cecil Mamiit H2H: 1-0
Jan-Michael Gambill holds a 1–0 lead over Cecil Mamiit in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan-Michael Gambill leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jan-Michael Gambill won the 2000 Los Angeles third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
PHI
Age 50
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2000* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jan-Michael Gambill | 6-3 6-2 | Cecil Mamiit | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Michael Gambill | #1,352 | #14 | 1,655 | 1,956 | 201 | 191 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Cecil Mamiit | #1,573 | #72 | 625 | 1,633 | 48 | 95 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan-Michael Gambill | Cecil Mamiit | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #186 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #229 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #33 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #93 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #111 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,642 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #111 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #95 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #183 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,557 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #226 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #687 | 1,567 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,503 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #462 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |