H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Jan-Michael Gambill vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 2-1

Jan-Michael Gambill holds a 2–1 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jan-Michael Gambill leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Cedric Pioline leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jan-Michael Gambill won the 2001 US Open round of 128 6-2 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jan-Michael Gambill
USA Age 49 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jan-Michael Gambill #19 6-2 6-2 6-4 Cedric Pioline #62 Match data Aug 29, 2001* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Cedric Pioline #6 5-7 6-2 6-3 Jan-Michael Gambill #62 Match data Jun 15, 2000* R32 Queen's Club Championships ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Jan-Michael Gambill #60 6-7(5) 7-6(5) 6-4 Cedric Pioline #18 Match data Aug 13, 1998* R32 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jan-Michael Gambill #1,352 #14 1,655 1,949 201 191 51.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,984 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 1 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jan-Michael Gambill Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1995 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1997 3–5 37.5% #186 1,520 0 0 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,482 0 0
21 1998 31–23 57.4% #38 1,754 0 0 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1999 25–25 50.0% #58 1,762 0 1 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 2000 33–26 55.9% #33 1,818 0 1 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,849 0 0
24 2001 35–22 61.4% #21 1,759 0 2 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 2002 28–26 51.9% #42 1,756 0 2 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,768 0 0
26 2003 22–25 46.8% #51 1,643 0 3 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,761 0 0
27 2004 18–25 41.9% #95 1,595 0 3 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,808 0 1
28 2005 5–10 33.3% #191 1,558 0 3 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,831 0 2
29 2006 1–1 50.0% #687 1,568 0 3 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,765 0 2
30 2007 0–2 0.0% #1107 1,504 0 3 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,796 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,763 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,658 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,619 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jan-Michael Gambill Cedric Pioline
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1998 23 13 36 63.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1999 20 15 35 57.1% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1991 6 6 12 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 2000 20 17 37 54.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1992 13 10 23 56.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5%
24 2001 29 13 42 69.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1993 19 9 28 67.9% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 7 20 65.0%
25 2002 24 16 40 60.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1994 15 11 26 57.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
26 2003 20 17 37 54.1% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1995 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5%
27 2004 15 18 33 45.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1996 12 7 19 63.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2%
28 2005 5 10 15 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 13 7 20 65.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
29 2006 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 15 13 28 53.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 5 15 66.7%
30 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 20 16 36 55.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 16 10 26 61.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 4 5 9 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 160 126 286 55.9% 10 32 42 23.8% 23 21 44 52.3% 8 12 20 40.0% — 146 118 264 55.3% 109 93 202 54.0% 46 29 75 61.3% 69 61 130 53.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 105/109 of Jan-Michael Gambill's and 560/651 of Cedric Pioline's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jan-Michael Gambill Cedric Pioline
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 40/41 3.5 3.4 59.0% 68.7% 51.3% 60.4% 46.4% 61.6% 38.4%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 53/58 5.8 3.7 57.0% 74.5% 46.4% 59.3% 41.4% 62.6% 36.9%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 68/78 5.7 3.0 59.8% 73.8% 52.0% 60.8% 40.6% 65.1% 39.4%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 44/57 4.5 3.3 60.1% 70.1% 48.9% 53.4% 42.1% 61.7% 39.9%
26 2003 43/47 10.1 3.1 56.5% 75.0% 47.9% 60.7% 48.3% 63.4% 36.0% 1995 44/51 4.9 3.8 57.9% 72.7% 48.2% 53.6% 37.8% 62.4% 37.6%
27 2004 43/43 11.7 3.1 59.1% 76.0% 47.7% 57.9% 38.7% 64.3% 34.3% 1996 53/59 6.0 3.2 55.9% 75.1% 51.7% 62.1% 44.4% 64.9% 39.6%
28 2005 15/15 12.3 3.9 56.6% 76.7% 45.9% 58.6% 27.7% 63.3% 32.1% 1997 51/62 5.9 3.5 60.9% 73.7% 51.1% 61.5% 42.4% 64.7% 38.6%
29 2006 2/2 11.5 7.0 47.8% 73.2% 44.1% 59.7% 35.0% 57.0% 39.4% 1998 56/64 5.4 3.3 58.6% 73.5% 50.4% 59.3% 47.1% 63.8% 38.3%
30 2007 2/2 9.5 5.5 58.7% 79.4% 39.2% 37.5% 20.8% 62.8% 26.7% 1999 54/65 6.0 4.6 54.4% 75.4% 49.2% 62.1% 42.4% 63.4% 36.2%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 46/51 8.2 4.8 52.7% 78.8% 51.3% 60.8% 41.8% 65.5% 39.5%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 31/39 8.3 4.6 52.5% 73.2% 51.4% 63.6% 40.7% 63.1% 36.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 20/26 5.7 4.4 51.2% 71.3% 48.3% 45.7% 32.5% 60.3% 33.6%
Career — 105/392 11.1 3.4 57.5% 75.7% 47.3% 58.8% 40.7% 63.6% 34.6% — 560/671 5.8 3.7 57.1% 73.7% 50.1% 59.3% 42.2% 63.5% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jan-Michael Gambill Cedric Pioline
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1995 1487 99.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 1520 116.3 — — — — +18 — — 33.3% -1.17 1–0 3–1 (75%) — -0.59 1989 1483 114.0 — — — — — +7 — 12.5% -1.88 0–1 — — -0.41
21 1998 1755 144.7 — — — — +27 -222 -139 53.4% +0.32 13–4 (76%) 11–12 (48%) 111.1 +0.72 1990 1484 124.4 — — — — +14 +43 — 34.9% -0.47 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 100.1 +0.10
22 1999 1763 145.0 — — — — +37 -263 -154 51.2% +0.26 8–11 (42%) 10–9 (53%) 102.4 -2.53 1991 1665 135.0 +1.05 -0.51 1.002 50.2% -79 -6 — 50.5% +0.06 8–8 (50%) 6–11 (35%) 101.5 -0.32
23 2000 1819 143.8 — — — — -27 -296 -44 56.3% +0.60 10–10 (50%) 10–17 (37%) 96.8 -1.79 1992 1849 149.9 +1.29 -1.12 0.985 50.1% -31 -113 -257 52.3% +0.22 10–11 (48%) 10–13 (43%) 101.4 -1.91
24 2001 1759 150.9 — — — — +67 -256 -39 61.9% +0.81 8–6 (57%) 11–10 (52%) 99.4 +0.99 1993 1937 156.7 +3.18 +1.96 1.128 52.1% +8 -173 -173 60.8% +0.75 16–11 (59%) 19–19 (50%) 100.8 -4.16
25 2002 1756 148.6 — — — — +48 -275 -49 51.9% +0.44 11–10 (52%) 11–14 (44%) 92.3 -0.54 1994 1768 141.9 +0.19 +1.74 1.042 50.9% +34 -22 -59 51.3% +0.05 12–15 (44%) 11–8 (58%) 94.5 -0.27
26 2003 1644 133.1 +0.95 -1.36 0.983 50.0% +72 -213 +27 48.2% +0.07 5–6 (45%) 9–9 (50%) 96.5 +1.55 1995 1762 147.6 +1.13 +0.42 1.001 49.8% -23 +16 +10 50.8% -0.06 4–9 (31%) 12–7 (63%) 100.1 -3.16
27 2004 1596 125.6 +0.40 -1.44 0.961 49.5% +33 -178 +70 44.1% -0.30 3–7 (30%) 13–11 (54%) 98.0 +1.48 1996 1809 154.8 +2.69 +2.35 1.129 52.1% -33 +87 +32 63.1% +0.93 8–8 (50%) 10–6 (63%) 101.9 -1.10
28 2005 1559 116.9 -1.32 -3.12 0.876 47.9% +9 — — 33.3% -0.92 2–2 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 101.5 +0.61 1997 1832 150.4 +2.57 +1.89 1.093 51.3% -28 +52 +117 57.1% +0.51 14–11 (56%) 9–10 (47%) 100.8 -2.00
29 2006 1569 105.0 -1.55 +1.41 0.916 48.6% — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — +0.02 1998 1765 148.9 +1.69 +0.86 1.058 51.0% +5 +162 +116 56.6% +0.30 12–10 (55%) 15–14 (52%) 96.7 -0.97
30 2007 1505 103.5 -0.27 -2.33 0.719 44.4% — — — 0.0% -1.75 — 0–1 — +0.01 1999 1797 143.0 +1.68 -0.71 0.989 50.0% -26 -11 +162 55.2% +0.07 9–13 (41%) 25–10 (71%) 101.1 -2.23
31 2008 1506 100.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1764 148.1 +2.89 +1.87 1.144 52.4% -10 +168 +138 60.6% +0.75 8–9 (47%) 15–13 (54%) 99.3 +0.89
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1658 131.9 +0.83 -1.42 0.999 50.1% +19 +151 +176 46.7% -0.27 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) 96.8 -0.75
33 2010 1508 103.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1620 134.1 -0.60 -1.51 0.847 46.8% +33 +134 +147 35.1% -0.91 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) 94.1 -2.76
Career — 1949 145.6 +0.33 -1.61 0.952 49.4% +35 -250 -44 51.3% +0.24 62–56 (53%) 82–87 (49%) 100.1 -0.01 — 1984 152.3 +1.77 +0.70 1.047 50.8% -10 +32 +46 54.2% +0.27 114–123 (48%) 149–132 (53%) 98.5 -2.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.