H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jan-Michael Gambill vs David Sanchez H2H: 1-2
David Sanchez holds a 2–1 lead over Jan-Michael Gambill in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while David Sanchez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, David Sanchez won the 2004 St. Poelten third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2004* | St. Poelten | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | David Sanchez | 6-3 6-4 | Jan-Michael Gambill | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2004* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | David Sanchez | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Jan-Michael Gambill | Match data |
| Aug 27, 2003* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jan-Michael Gambill | 7-6(3) 6-2 6-2 | David Sanchez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Michael Gambill | #1,352 | #14 | 1,655 | 1,956 | 201 | 191 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| David Sanchez | #1,116 | #41 | 832 | 1,730 | 87 | 119 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan-Michael Gambill | David Sanchez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #262 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #186 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #33 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #74 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #60 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #50 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2003 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,642 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2004 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #95 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #137 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,557 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #687 | 1,567 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,503 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |