H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Jan-Michael Gambill vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 0-1
Hyung-Taik Lee holds a 1–0 lead over Jan-Michael Gambill in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hyung-Taik Lee leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hyung-Taik Lee won the 2005 San Jose third round 6-3 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2005* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Hyung-Taik Lee | 6-3 7-6(4) | Jan-Michael Gambill | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Michael Gambill | #1,352 | #14 | 1,655 | 1,956 | 201 | 191 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jan-Michael Gambill | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #186 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #33 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,642 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #95 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,557 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #687 | 1,567 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,503 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |