H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Jan-Michael Gambill vs Jan Vacek H2H: 2-0
Jan-Michael Gambill holds a 2–0 lead over Jan Vacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jan-Michael Gambill leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jan-Michael Gambill won the 2002 St. Poelten third round 6-3 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 50
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2002* | St. Poelten | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jan-Michael Gambill | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Jan Vacek | Match data |
| Feb 28, 2002* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jan-Michael Gambill | 6-2 6-3 | Jan Vacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Michael Gambill | #1,352 | #14 | 1,655 | 1,956 | 201 | 191 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jan Vacek | #1,155 | #61 | 646 | 1,640 | 30 | 59 | 33.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan-Michael Gambill | Jan Vacek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #186 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #33 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2001 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2002 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #75 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2003 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,642 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 10–24 | 29.4% | #110 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2004 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #95 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #129 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,557 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #176 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #687 | 1,567 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,463 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,503 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #298 | 1,490 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #235 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #563 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |