H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Jan-Michael Gambill vs Jonathan Stark H2H: 1-0
Jan-Michael Gambill holds a 1–0 lead over Jonathan Stark in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan-Michael Gambill leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jan-Michael Gambill won the 1998 Singapore third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 1998* | Singapore | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jan-Michael Gambill | 6-1 6-2 | Jonathan Stark | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Michael Gambill | #1,352 | #14 | 1,655 | 1,956 | 201 | 191 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jonathan Stark | #829 | #36 | 913 | 1,801 | 135 | 150 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan-Michael Gambill | Jonathan Stark | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1007 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #186 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #243 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #38 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #33 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2001 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2002 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #68 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2003 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,642 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #96 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2004 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #95 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #266 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,557 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #300 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #687 | 1,567 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #512 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,503 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,556 | 0 | 2 |