H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 19:16 UTC
Jan-Michael Gambill vs M. Tebbutt H2H: 0-2
M. Tebbutt holds a 2–0 lead over Jan-Michael Gambill in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, M. Tebbutt leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, M. Tebbutt won the 1998 Shanghai fourth round 5-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 55
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 1998* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | M. Tebbutt | 5-0 (ret.) | Jan-Michael Gambill | Match data |
| Aug 14, 1995 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | M. Tebbutt | 6-3 6-3 | Jan-Michael Gambill | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Michael Gambill | #1,352 | #14 | 1,655 | 1,956 | 201 | 191 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| M. Tebbutt | #1,411 | #87 | 527 | 1,735 | 64 | 84 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan-Michael Gambill | M. Tebbutt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #186 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #179 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #33 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #133 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #94 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #134 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,642 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #146 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #95 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #122 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,557 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #351 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #687 | 1,567 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #702 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,503 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #415 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |