H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jan-Michael Gambill vs Max Mirnyi H2H: 2-1
Jan-Michael Gambill holds a 2–1 lead over Max Mirnyi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Jan-Michael Gambill leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jan-Michael Gambill won the 2004 Wimbledon first round 6-3 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2004* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Jan-Michael Gambill | 6-3 7-5 6-4 | Max Mirnyi | Match data |
| Oct 9, 2003* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Max Mirnyi | 6-4 6-2 | Jan-Michael Gambill | Match data |
| Nov 23, 2000* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jan-Michael Gambill | 7-5 6-3 | Max Mirnyi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Michael Gambill | #1,352 | #14 | 1,655 | 1,956 | 201 | 191 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Max Mirnyi | #1,155 | #18 | 1,320 | 1,913 | 216 | 222 | 49.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan-Michael Gambill | Max Mirnyi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #186 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #74 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #33 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #35 | 1,865 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #43 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #23 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2003 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,642 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #47 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2004 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #95 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,557 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #59 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #687 | 1,567 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #152 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,503 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #523 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |