H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 01:16 UTC
Jan-Michael Gambill vs Nicolas Escude H2H: 1-0
Jan-Michael Gambill holds a 1–0 lead over Nicolas Escude in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan-Michael Gambill leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jan-Michael Gambill won the 1998 Canada Masters second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 1998* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jan-Michael Gambill | 6-3 6-2 | Nicolas Escude | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Michael Gambill | #1,352 | #14 | 1,655 | 1,956 | 201 | 191 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Nicolas Escude | #1,071 | #17 | 1,357 | 1,909 | 157 | 124 | 55.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan-Michael Gambill | Nicolas Escude | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #670 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #186 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #33 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #37 | 1,820 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2001 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2002 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2003 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,642 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #34 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2004 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #95 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #114 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,557 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #64 | 1,829 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #687 | 1,567 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,503 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |