H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jan-Michael Gambill vs Paul Goldstein H2H: 3-0
Jan-Michael Gambill holds a 3–0 lead over Paul Goldstein in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jan-Michael Gambill leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jan-Michael Gambill won the 2002 Memphis fourth round 4-6 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2007 | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Paul Goldstein | 5-4 (ret.) | Jan-Michael Gambill | Match data |
| Feb 22, 2002* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jan-Michael Gambill | 4-6 6-2 6-0 | Paul Goldstein | Match data |
| Jul 27, 2001* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jan-Michael Gambill | 6-1 6-4 | Paul Goldstein | Match data |
| Jul 2, 2000* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Jan-Michael Gambill | 7-6(10) 6-2 6-2 | Paul Goldstein | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Michael Gambill | #1,352 | #14 | 1,655 | 1,956 | 201 | 191 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Paul Goldstein | #1,120 | #58 | 668 | 1,746 | 85 | 115 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan-Michael Gambill | Paul Goldstein | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #781 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1219 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1011 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #432 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #186 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #189 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #89 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #33 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #81 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #182 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,642 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #107 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #95 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #190 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,557 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #67 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #687 | 1,567 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #70 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,503 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #166 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |