H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jan-Michael Gambill vs Peter Wessels H2H: 1-2
Peter Wessels holds a 2–1 lead over Jan-Michael Gambill in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Peter Wessels leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jan-Michael Gambill won the 2005 Tokyo second round 6-2 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 48
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2005* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Jan-Michael Gambill | 6-2 5-7 6-3 | Peter Wessels | Match data |
| Feb 4, 2005* | Delray Beach | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Peter Wessels | 6-4 6-7(3) 6-3 | Jan-Michael Gambill | Match data |
| Jun 18, 1998* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Peter Wessels | 6-4 6-4 | Jan-Michael Gambill | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Michael Gambill | #1,352 | #14 | 1,655 | 1,956 | 201 | 191 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Peter Wessels | #987 | #72 | 586 | 1,715 | 43 | 58 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan-Michael Gambill | Peter Wessels | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #369 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #321 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #186 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #108 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #150 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #33 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2001 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #465 | 1,565 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2002 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2003 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,642 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #89 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2004 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #95 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #144 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,557 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #401 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #687 | 1,567 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #163 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,503 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |