H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Jan-Michael Gambill vs Takahiro Terachi H2H: 1-0
Jan-Michael Gambill holds a 1–0 lead over Takahiro Terachi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan-Michael Gambill leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jan-Michael Gambill won the 2004 Tokyo third round 7-6(5) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 47
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2004* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jan-Michael Gambill | 7-6(5) 6-1 | Takahiro Terachi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Michael Gambill | #1,352 | #14 | 1,655 | 1,956 | 201 | 191 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Takahiro Terachi | #1,391 | #219 | 161 | 1,551 | 4 | 7 | 36.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan-Michael Gambill | Takahiro Terachi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #186 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #266 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #33 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #279 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #638 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,642 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2004 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #95 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #397 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,557 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #687 | 1,567 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,503 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |