H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jan-Michael Gambill vs Takao Suzuki H2H: 0-2
Takao Suzuki holds a 2–0 lead over Jan-Michael Gambill in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Takao Suzuki leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Takao Suzuki won the 2005 Australian Open first round 6-4 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 49
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2005* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Takao Suzuki | 6-4 6-3 6-3 | Jan-Michael Gambill | Match data |
| Oct 2, 2002* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Takao Suzuki | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Jan-Michael Gambill | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Michael Gambill | #1,352 | #14 | 1,655 | 1,956 | 201 | 191 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Takao Suzuki | #1,016 | #102 | 470 | 1,669 | 23 | 34 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan-Michael Gambill | Takao Suzuki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #487 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #517 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #186 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #272 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #262 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #33 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #225 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,642 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #205 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #95 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #212 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,557 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #272 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #687 | 1,567 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #471 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,503 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #509 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |