H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jan-Michael Gambill vs Thomas Johansson H2H: 1-2
Thomas Johansson holds a 2–1 lead over Jan-Michael Gambill in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Thomas Johansson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Thomas Johansson won the 2001 Hamburg Masters fourth round 3-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2001* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Thomas Johansson | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | Jan-Michael Gambill | Match data |
| Sep 3, 2000* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Thomas Johansson | 3-6 6-3 7-6(5) 7-6(1) | Jan-Michael Gambill | Match data |
| Aug 24, 2000* | Long Island | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jan-Michael Gambill | 7-6(5) 7-5 | Thomas Johansson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Michael Gambill | #1,352 | #14 | 1,655 | 1,956 | 201 | 191 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Thomas Johansson | #586 | #7 | 2,365 | 1,969 | 336 | 277 | 54.8% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan-Michael Gambill | Thomas Johansson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #422 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #186 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #117 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #60 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #39 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #33 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 46–30 | 60.5% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2001 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #39 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2002 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #39 | 1,825 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2003 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,642 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2004 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #95 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #14 | 1,746 | 1 | 7 |
| 28 | 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,557 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #687 | 1,567 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #30 | 1,855 | 1 | 8 |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,503 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,892 | 1 | 9 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #71 | 1,723 | 1 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,759 | 1 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #136 | 1,673 | 1 | 9 |