H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jan Siemerink vs Andrei Olhovskiy H2H: 3-0
Jan Siemerink holds a 3–0 lead over Andrei Olhovskiy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jan Siemerink leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jan Siemerink won the 1996 Nottingham third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 56
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 1996* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Jan Siemerink | 6-3 6-3 | Andrei Olhovskiy | Match data |
| Jan 5, 1995* | Doha | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jan Siemerink | 6-1 6-2 | Andrei Olhovskiy | Match data |
| Nov 12, 1992* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jan Siemerink | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | Andrei Olhovskiy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Siemerink | #987 | #14 | 1,863 | 1,908 | 261 | 260 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Andrei Olhovskiy | #1,310 | #49 | 690 | 1,750 | 113 | 162 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan Siemerink | Andrei Olhovskiy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1990 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #135 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1991 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #26 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #57 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #53 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #302 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #81 | 1,685 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #136 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #15 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #80 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #78 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #65 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1998 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #97 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1999 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #88 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #118 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2000 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2001 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #127 | 1,564 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 0–14 | 0.0% | #442 | 1,480 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,532 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1256 | 1,470 | 0 | 2 |