H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jan Siemerink vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 3-2

Jan Siemerink holds a 3–2 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Jan Siemerink leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1998 London semifinal 6-3 7-6(4).

NED Age 56 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 28, 1998* London ATP 250 SF Carpet Cedric Pioline #18 6-3 7-6(4) Jan Siemerink #60 Match data
Nov 8, 1997* Stockholm ATP 250 QF Hard Jan Siemerink #105 6-4 6-2 Cedric Pioline #23 Match data
Oct 3, 1996* Lyon ATP 250 R32 Carpet Jan Siemerink #38 7-6(4) 7-5 Cedric Pioline #17 Match data
Jun 26, 1996* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Cedric Pioline #16 7-6(4) 7-6(5) 6-4 Jan Siemerink #19 Match data
Jul 24, 1992* Hilversum ATP 250 R16 Clay Jan Siemerink #52 6-4 7-5 Cedric Pioline #66 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jan Siemerink #987 #14 1,863 1,908 261 260 50.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jan Siemerink Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1990 5–4 55.6% #135 1,541 0 0 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1991 30–21 58.8% #26 1,756 0 1 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1992 22–26 45.8% #57 1,747 0 1 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1993 24–25 49.0% #53 1,670 0 1 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1994 16–19 45.7% #81 1,685 0 1 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1995 37–29 56.1% #21 1,784 0 1 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 1996 35–27 56.5% #15 1,866 0 2 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 1997 18–27 40.0% #78 1,738 0 2 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 1998 38–24 61.3% #19 1,809 0 4 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 1999 17–25 40.5% #88 1,665 0 4 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 2000 7–14 33.3% #104 1,576 0 4 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 2001 12–17 41.4% #127 1,564 0 4 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 2002 0–2 0.0% #438 1,532 0 4 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5