H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jan Siemerink vs Dennis van Scheppingen H2H: 1-0
Jan Siemerink holds a 1–0 lead over Dennis van Scheppingen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan Siemerink leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jan Siemerink won the 1998 New Haven third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 56
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2002 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q1 | Clay | Jan Siemerink | 6-2 7-6(6) | Dennis van Scheppingen | Match data |
| Aug 20, 1998* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jan Siemerink | 6-3 6-3 | Dennis van Scheppingen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Siemerink | #987 | #14 | 1,863 | 1,908 | 261 | 260 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Dennis van Scheppingen | #1,545 | #72 | 552 | 1,666 | 42 | 73 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan Siemerink | Dennis van Scheppingen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #764 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #732 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #135 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #113 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #26 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #57 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #120 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #53 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #439 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #81 | 1,685 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #206 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #121 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #15 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #156 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #78 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1998 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1999 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #88 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #251 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2000 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2001 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #127 | 1,564 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #358 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,532 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |