H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Jan Siemerink vs Diego Nargiso H2H: 2-1

Jan Siemerink holds a 2–1 lead over Diego Nargiso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Jan Siemerink leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jan Siemerink won the 1998 Copenhagen round of 16 6-4 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jan Siemerink
NED Age 56 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Diego Nargiso
ITA Age 56 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jan Siemerink #31 6-4 4-6 6-3 Diego Nargiso #128 Match data Mar 13, 1998* R16 Copenhagen ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Jan Siemerink #24 1-6 5-7 6-2 7-6(8) 6-1 Diego Nargiso #183 Match data Jan 19, 1996* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Diego Nargiso #128 6-0 7-6(4) Jan Siemerink #118 Match data Oct 15, 1994* QF Ostrava ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jan Siemerink #987 #14 1,863 1,902 261 262 49.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Diego Nargiso #1,400 #67 531 1,702 95 153 38.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jan Siemerink Diego Nargiso
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #191 1,511 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1988 11–13 45.8% #90 1,626 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1989 11–19 36.7% #150 1,593 0 0
20 1990 5–4 55.6% #135 1,541 0 0 1990 4–6 40.0% #147 1,620 0 0
21 1991 30–21 58.8% #26 1,756 0 1 1991 9–14 39.1% #109 1,604 0 0
22 1992 22–27 44.9% #57 1,741 0 1 1992 19–22 46.3% #88 1,597 0 0
23 1993 24–25 49.0% #53 1,669 0 1 1993 8–23 25.8% #120 1,526 0 0
24 1994 16–19 45.7% #81 1,686 0 1 1994 10–18 35.7% #118 1,531 0 0
25 1995 37–29 56.1% #21 1,768 0 1 1995 5–10 33.3% #183 1,530 0 0
26 1996 35–28 55.6% #15 1,861 0 2 1996 2–8 20.0% #280 1,507 0 0
27 1997 18–27 40.0% #78 1,738 0 2 1997 2–3 40.0% #152 1,546 0 0
28 1998 38–24 61.3% #19 1,809 0 4 1998 4–6 40.0% #128 1,563 0 0
29 1999 17–25 40.5% #88 1,653 0 4 1999 1–5 16.7% #220 1,523 0 0
30 2000 7–14 33.3% #104 1,573 0 4 2000 8–4 66.7% #134 1,625 0 0
31 2001 12–17 41.4% #127 1,563 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 2002 0–2 0.0% #438 1,531 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jan Siemerink Diego Nargiso
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 8 7 15 53.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 4 7 11 36.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
20 1990 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1991 16 7 23 69.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 1991 1 3 4 25.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1992 10 12 22 45.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 7 16 56.3% 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
23 1993 11 13 24 45.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 1993 4 9 13 30.8% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
24 1994 9 11 20 45.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% 1994 1 4 5 20.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0%
25 1995 20 12 32 62.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 1996 14 14 28 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 12 8 20 60.0% 1996 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1997 10 12 22 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1997 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
28 1998 18 11 29 62.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 1998 2 1 3 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1999 10 12 22 45.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1999 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2000 2 8 10 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2000 1 2 3 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — —
31 2001 6 6 12 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 129 121 250 51.6% 29 50 79 36.7% 28 30 58 48.3% 75 61 136 55.1% — 33 47 80 41.2% 30 64 94 31.9% 11 15 26 42.3% 21 27 48 43.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 448/514 of Jan Siemerink's and 164/181 of Diego Nargiso's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jan Siemerink Diego Nargiso
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 1991 48/51 7.0 5.1 52.3% 75.3% 53.3% 58.8% 44.6% 64.8% 37.8% 1991 22/23 6.7 5.4 55.7% 74.1% 51.5% 62.6% 37.2% 63.8% 35.6%
22 1992 42/49 6.2 4.2 54.6% 72.8% 50.4% 63.1% 36.0% 62.7% 34.7% 1992 38/41 6.9 4.9 53.9% 75.4% 48.2% 63.7% 48.5% 62.7% 36.2%
23 1993 41/49 6.4 4.0 56.6% 76.6% 50.8% 62.6% 44.2% 65.2% 35.5% 1993 27/31 6.1 4.0 54.0% 72.0% 45.3% 55.7% 36.1% 59.7% 35.7%
24 1994 34/35 6.1 4.0 60.1% 75.5% 50.2% 63.0% 40.6% 65.5% 36.4% 1994 27/28 5.6 5.5 50.7% 69.4% 45.3% 51.7% 46.5% 57.6% 38.8%
25 1995 61/66 5.4 3.4 59.5% 73.7% 53.2% 64.8% 37.0% 65.3% 35.9% 1995 13/15 6.8 6.1 50.9% 72.5% 46.3% 53.1% 49.4% 59.5% 36.3%
26 1996 61/63 6.5 5.1 55.7% 75.7% 51.2% 65.5% 39.7% 64.8% 35.9% 1996 9/10 5.1 7.7 54.5% 68.2% 39.5% 61.9% 36.7% 54.8% 36.1%
27 1997 38/45 7.7 5.0 56.5% 74.2% 52.0% 66.9% 45.4% 64.4% 35.1% 1997 4/5 4.8 3.3 54.8% 72.6% 44.6% 72.0% 22.2% 59.9% 29.6%
28 1998 48/62 8.3 4.6 58.0% 77.7% 52.2% 65.2% 43.2% 66.9% 34.3% 1998 9/10 5.6 3.1 54.8% 73.0% 49.4% 43.9% 47.4% 62.7% 38.4%
29 1999 30/42 5.9 5.1 55.5% 73.7% 50.1% 56.9% 38.4% 63.1% 32.6% 1999 5/6 4.6 3.0 58.5% 63.4% 43.0% 64.9% 31.7% 54.6% 30.8%
30 2000 17/21 6.5 5.8 54.9% 73.6% 46.0% 64.2% 28.0% 61.4% 33.6% 2000 10/12 6.5 4.0 55.1% 79.1% 48.5% 44.7% 51.7% 65.2% 38.7%
31 2001 26/29 7.2 5.9 52.8% 75.6% 48.7% 56.6% 34.2% 62.7% 32.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2002 2/2 7.0 6.0 54.2% 76.2% 50.9% 42.9% 50.0% 64.8% 27.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 448/523 6.6 4.6 56.3% 75.1% 51.3% 62.8% 40.0% 64.6% 35.2% — 164/248 6.2 4.9 53.7% 72.7% 46.9% 57.3% 43.0% 60.7% 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jan Siemerink Diego Nargiso
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1511 117.3 — — — — — +35 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — -0.22
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1627 124.8 — — — — -27 -80 -33 46.9% -0.81 2–5 (29%) 11–1 (92%) 106.6 +0.18
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1593 128.6 — — — — -51 +6 -10 40.5% -0.61 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 100.5 -1.78
20 1990 1541 108.1 — — — — +36 — — 52.6% -0.05 1–0 — — +1.03 1990 1621 133.5 — — — — -33 -6 — 37.5% -0.67 2–0 3–3 (50%) — -0.55
21 1991 1757 143.1 +3.22 -0.58 1.074 51.5% +40 -248 -209 55.7% +0.44 11–10 (52%) 14–13 (52%) 103.1 -0.39 1991 1604 129.0 +1.95 -2.04 0.984 49.3% -51 +20 +36 45.6% -0.21 1–6 (14%) 9–10 (47%) 95.1 -0.69
22 1992 1741 139.7 +1.78 -2.28 0.929 49.2% +31 -264 -201 43.8% -0.47 7–7 (50%) 10–6 (63%) 101.1 -2.48 1992 1597 130.3 +1.50 -1.75 0.972 49.7% +42 -3 +10 51.9% -0.02 4–12 (25%) 9–7 (56%) 94.6 +2.22
23 1993 1669 136.6 +2.63 -1.58 1.020 50.4% +20 -120 -143 50.0% +0.11 8–11 (42%) 13–14 (48%) 93.9 +0.60 1993 1526 127.3 -0.86 -2.64 0.886 47.7% +68 +4 — 33.3% -0.83 2–6 (25%) 6–13 (32%) 94.7 -0.26
24 1994 1686 139.2 +3.09 -0.26 1.054 50.9% -6 -131 — 48.8% +0.01 3–7 (30%) 8–8 (50%) 97.2 -1.29 1994 1532 129.5 -2.33 -0.45 0.916 48.2% +95 -56 +44 38.9% -0.65 5–7 (42%) 5–5 (50%) 101.5 +0.26
25 1995 1768 149.5 +3.33 -1.32 1.035 50.6% -12 -116 -191 54.4% +0.22 11–8 (58%) 12–7 (63%) 111.6 -2.79 1995 1530 121.5 -1.52 -1.31 0.895 48.0% +72 -44 +59 38.9% -0.47 0–3 (0%) 3–5 (38%) 96.1 +0.11
26 1996 1862 148.8 +2.53 -0.73 1.019 50.6% -13 -212 -147 54.0% +0.10 11–10 (52%) 30–16 (65%) 109.9 -1.35 1996 1508 114.3 -4.18 -0.49 0.799 46.0% +85 -38 — 32.3% -1.42 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.9 -0.08
27 1997 1739 137.7 +1.77 -1.30 0.987 50.2% +24 -75 -78 43.8% -0.28 7–12 (37%) 12–13 (48%) 97.6 -0.14 1997 1547 124.6 +0.07 -0.53 0.739 45.4% +84 — — 33.3% -0.75 2–0 1–1 — -0.59
28 1998 1810 145.1 +3.80 -2.09 1.038 50.9% +13 -234 -13 57.3% +0.46 15–7 (68%) 14–16 (47%) 103.5 -0.24 1998 1564 120.6 +0.37 -0.45 1.029 50.3% +93 -104 — 50.0% -0.33 0–4 (0%) 0–1 — +0.18
29 1999 1654 132.5 +1.25 -2.98 0.884 48.1% +56 -141 +72 42.6% -0.49 6–7 (46%) 7–9 (44%) 96.5 +0.21 1999 1524 107.2 -1.01 -2.74 0.678 43.7% — -79 — 23.1% -1.54 0–1 0–3 (0%) — 0.00
30 2000 1573 115.4 -0.13 -3.10 0.870 47.9% +66 -41 +96 37.0% -0.83 3–5 (38%) 4–2 (67%) 98.7 +0.50 2000 1625 118.8 +1.47 -0.06 1.112 51.4% +19 -21 — 68.0% +0.72 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) 106.9 +0.50
31 2001 1564 122.8 +0.45 -4.28 0.859 47.7% +102 -52 +33 38.7% -0.73 6–4 (60%) 6–11 (35%) 101.1 -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2002 1531 102.5 -1.57 -0.36 0.773 46.8% — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1902 144.8 +2.44 -1.62 0.993 50.1% +20 -133 -71 49.5% -0.03 89–89 (50%) 131–118 (53%) 104.4 -1.24 — 1703 135.7 -0.19 -1.44 0.926 48.6% +29 -23 +20 42.9% -0.51 30–56 (35%) 58–60 (49%) 97.6 -0.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.