H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jan Siemerink vs Gilad Bloom H2H: 1-2

Gilad Bloom holds a 2–1 lead over Jan Siemerink in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Gilad Bloom leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gilad Bloom won the 1992 Moscow round of 16 3-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jan Siemerink
NED Age 56 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Gilad Bloom
ISR Age 59 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gilad Bloom #140 3-6 6-3 6-4 Jan Siemerink #57 Match data Nov 13, 1992* R16 Moscow ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Gilad Bloom #136 5-7 6-4 6-4 4-6 6-2 Jan Siemerink #53 Match data May 27, 1992* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Jan Siemerink #44 6-4 6-3 Gilad Bloom #82 Match data Apr 28, 1991* F Singapore ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jan Siemerink #987 #14 1,863 1,902 261 262 49.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Gilad Bloom #1,295 #61 524 1,749 83 105 44.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jan Siemerink Gilad Bloom
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1984 1–1 50.0% #385 1,503 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1985 1–1 50.0% #452 1,505 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1986 2–1 66.7% #152 1,538 0 0
20 1990 5–4 55.6% #135 1,541 0 0 1987 10–16 38.5% #139 1,546 0 0
21 1991 30–21 58.8% #26 1,756 0 1 1988 6–12 33.3% #210 1,550 0 0
22 1992 22–27 44.9% #57 1,741 0 1 1989 5–6 45.5% #105 1,569 0 0
23 1993 24–25 49.0% #53 1,669 0 1 1990 25–21 54.3% #66 1,736 0 0
24 1994 16–19 45.7% #81 1,686 0 1 1991 15–24 38.5% #125 1,635 0 0
25 1995 37–29 56.1% #21 1,768 0 1 1992 14–15 48.3% #137 1,662 0 0
26 1996 35–28 55.6% #15 1,861 0 2 1993 2–4 33.3% #167 1,634 0 0
27 1997 18–27 40.0% #78 1,738 0 2 1994 2–3 40.0% #217 1,623 0 0
28 1998 38–24 61.3% #19 1,809 0 4 1995 0–1 0.0% #407 1,612 0 0
29 1999 17–25 40.5% #88 1,653 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 2000 7–14 33.3% #104 1,573 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 2001 12–17 41.4% #127 1,563 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 2002 0–2 0.0% #438 1,531 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jan Siemerink Gilad Bloom
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1990 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
21 1991 16 7 23 69.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1992 10 12 22 45.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 7 16 56.3% 1989 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1993 11 13 24 45.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 1990 17 14 31 54.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1994 9 11 20 45.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% 1991 14 16 30 46.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1995 20 12 32 62.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1992 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
26 1996 14 14 28 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 12 8 20 60.0% 1993 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1997 10 12 22 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1998 18 11 29 62.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1999 10 12 22 45.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2000 2 8 10 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2001 6 6 12 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 129 121 250 51.6% 29 50 79 36.7% 28 30 58 48.3% 75 61 136 55.1% — 55 60 115 47.8% 9 21 30 30.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 9 12 21 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 448/514 of Jan Siemerink's and 68/80 of Gilad Bloom's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jan Siemerink Gilad Bloom
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 1991 48/51 7.0 5.1 52.3% 75.3% 53.3% 58.8% 44.6% 64.8% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1992 42/49 6.2 4.2 54.6% 72.8% 50.4% 63.1% 36.0% 62.7% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1993 41/49 6.4 4.0 56.6% 76.6% 50.8% 62.6% 44.2% 65.2% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1994 34/35 6.1 4.0 60.1% 75.5% 50.2% 63.0% 40.6% 65.5% 36.4% 1991 34/39 2.1 2.3 62.5% 66.8% 48.2% 55.3% 43.3% 59.7% 38.2%
25 1995 61/66 5.4 3.4 59.5% 73.7% 53.2% 64.8% 37.0% 65.3% 35.9% 1992 24/29 2.3 3.0 64.5% 64.6% 49.2% 56.2% 42.2% 59.1% 38.2%
26 1996 61/63 6.5 5.1 55.7% 75.7% 51.2% 65.5% 39.7% 64.8% 35.9% 1993 5/6 2.0 3.4 66.2% 67.9% 46.4% 57.3% 53.1% 60.5% 39.2%
27 1997 38/45 7.7 5.0 56.5% 74.2% 52.0% 66.9% 45.4% 64.4% 35.1% 1994 4/5 3.0 1.5 60.9% 62.6% 47.4% 46.3% 43.1% 56.5% 41.9%
28 1998 48/62 8.3 4.6 58.0% 77.7% 52.2% 65.2% 43.2% 66.9% 34.3% 1995 1/1 0.0 1.0 46.3% 60.0% 34.5% 50.0% 40.0% 46.3% 40.0%
29 1999 30/42 5.9 5.1 55.5% 73.7% 50.1% 56.9% 38.4% 63.1% 32.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2000 17/21 6.5 5.8 54.9% 73.6% 46.0% 64.2% 28.0% 61.4% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2001 26/29 7.2 5.9 52.8% 75.6% 48.7% 56.6% 34.2% 62.7% 32.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2002 2/2 7.0 6.0 54.2% 76.2% 50.9% 42.9% 50.0% 64.8% 27.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 448/523 6.6 4.6 56.3% 75.1% 51.3% 62.8% 40.0% 64.6% 35.2% — 68/188 2.2 2.5 63.1% 65.8% 48.2% 55.1% 43.6% 59.1% 38.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jan Siemerink Gilad Bloom
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1504 101.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.36
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1506 101.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.34 1–1 1–0 — +0.41
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1539 115.3 — — — — +41 — — 62.5% +1.25 1–1 — — +0.23
20 1990 1541 108.1 — — — — +36 — — 52.6% -0.05 1–0 — — +1.03 1987 1546 112.7 — — — — +44 -44 0 40.5% -0.92 6–5 (55%) 5–4 (56%) — +2.10
21 1991 1757 143.1 +3.22 -0.58 1.074 51.5% +40 -248 -209 55.7% +0.44 11–10 (52%) 14–13 (52%) — -0.39 1988 1550 124.8 — — — — +10 -16 — 41.2% -0.45 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.23
22 1992 1741 139.7 +1.78 -2.28 0.929 49.2% +31 -264 -201 43.8% -0.47 7–7 (50%) 10–6 (63%) — -2.48 1989 1570 117.7 — — — — +29 — — 40.7% -0.41 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +0.89
23 1993 1669 136.6 +2.63 -1.58 1.020 50.4% +20 -120 -143 50.0% +0.11 8–11 (42%) 13–14 (48%) — +0.60 1990 1736 132.7 — — — — +3 -224 -113 50.0% -0.05 9–4 (69%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.07
24 1994 1686 139.2 +3.09 -0.26 1.054 50.9% -6 -131 — 48.8% +0.01 3–7 (30%) 8–8 (50%) — -1.29 1991 1635 129.6 -1.33 -0.10 0.947 48.9% +36 -169 -26 43.3% -0.34 3–11 (21%) 3–8 (27%) — -1.07
25 1995 1768 149.5 +3.33 -1.32 1.035 50.6% -12 -116 -191 54.4% +0.22 11–8 (58%) 12–7 (63%) — -2.79 1992 1662 122.5 -2.20 -0.46 0.933 48.8% +11 -173 -51 48.7% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.91
26 1996 1862 148.8 +2.53 -0.73 1.019 50.6% -13 -212 -147 54.0% +0.10 11–10 (52%) 30–16 (65%) — -1.35 1993 1635 107.0 +0.30 +0.70 0.994 50.2% +14 — — 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.15
27 1997 1739 137.7 +1.77 -1.30 0.987 50.2% +24 -75 -78 43.8% -0.28 7–12 (37%) 12–13 (48%) — -0.14 1994 1623 114.8 +0.78 +0.24 0.963 48.9% — -113 — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 0–1 — -0.05
28 1998 1810 145.1 +3.80 -2.09 1.038 50.9% +13 -234 -13 57.3% +0.46 15–7 (68%) 14–16 (47%) — -0.24 1995 1613 102.1 +0.57 -1.46 0.745 43.3% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.11
29 1999 1654 132.5 +1.25 -2.98 0.884 48.1% +56 -141 +72 42.6% -0.49 6–7 (46%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2000 1573 115.4 -0.13 -3.10 0.870 47.9% +66 -41 +96 37.0% -0.83 3–5 (38%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2001 1564 122.8 +0.45 -4.28 0.859 47.7% +102 -52 +33 38.7% -0.73 6–4 (60%) 6–11 (35%) — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2002 1531 102.5 -1.57 -0.36 0.773 46.8% — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1902 144.8 +2.44 -1.62 0.993 50.1% +20 -133 -71 49.5% -0.03 89–89 (50%) 131–118 (53%) 104.4 -1.24 — 1749 130.0 -1.37 -0.17 0.942 48.9% +21 -113 -54 45.0% -0.33 31–36 (46%) 23–32 (42%) 99.0 +1.87

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.