H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jan Siemerink vs Gilad Bloom H2H: 1-2
Gilad Bloom holds a 2–1 lead over Jan Siemerink in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Gilad Bloom leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gilad Bloom won the 1992 Moscow fourth round 3-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 56
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 59
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 1992* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Gilad Bloom | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Jan Siemerink | Match data |
| May 27, 1992* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Gilad Bloom | 5-7 6-4 6-4 4-6 6-2 | Jan Siemerink | Match data |
| Apr 28, 1991* | Singapore | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Jan Siemerink | 6-4 6-3 | Gilad Bloom | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Siemerink | #987 | #14 | 1,863 | 1,908 | 261 | 260 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Gilad Bloom | #1,295 | #61 | 524 | 1,750 | 82 | 103 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan Siemerink | Gilad Bloom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #385 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #452 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #152 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #135 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #26 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #210 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #57 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #105 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #53 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #81 | 1,685 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #137 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #15 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #78 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #217 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1998 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1999 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #88 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2001 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #127 | 1,564 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,532 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |