H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jan Siemerink vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 1-2
Jeff Tarango holds a 2–1 lead over Jan Siemerink in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jeff Tarango leads 1–0 on carpet, while Jan Siemerink leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jeff Tarango won the 1999 Doha third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 56
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 57
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 1999* | Doha | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jeff Tarango | 6-3 6-3 | Jan Siemerink | Match data |
| Oct 2, 1997* | Basel | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jeff Tarango | 7-6(4) 6-2 | Jan Siemerink | Match data |
| May 14, 1997* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Jan Siemerink | 7-5 6-3 | Jeff Tarango | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Siemerink | #987 | #14 | 1,863 | 1,908 | 261 | 260 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Jeff Tarango | #1,001 | #42 | 877 | 1,787 | 239 | 293 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan Siemerink | Jeff Tarango | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #377 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #96 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #135 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #26 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #131 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #57 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #106 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #53 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #45 | 1,694 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1994 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #81 | 1,685 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1995 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #78 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1996 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #15 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #76 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #78 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #106 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1998 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1999 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #88 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #73 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2000 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #55 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2001 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #127 | 1,564 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 10–24 | 29.4% | #112 | 1,515 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,532 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #323 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #730 | 1,446 | 0 | 2 |