H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Jan Siemerink vs John Fitzgerald H2H: 0-2

John Fitzgerald holds a 2–0 lead over Jan Siemerink in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, John Fitzgerald leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, John Fitzgerald won the 1992 Australian Open round of 64 7-5 6-1 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jan Siemerink
NED Age 56 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
John Fitzgerald
AUS Age 65 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
John Fitzgerald #167 7-5 6-1 7-6(4) Jan Siemerink #26 Match data Jan 17, 1992* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
John Fitzgerald #205 6-2 7-6(3) Jan Siemerink #26 Match data Jan 2, 1992* R32 Adelaide International ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jan Siemerink #987 #14 1,863 1,902 261 262 49.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4
John Fitzgerald #765 #25 321 1,859 230 222 50.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jan Siemerink John Fitzgerald
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1979 1–4 20.0% #305 1,471 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1980 4–8 33.3% #136 1,524 0 0
20 1990 5–4 55.6% #135 1,541 0 0 1981 26–24 52.0% #60 1,674 0 1
21 1991 30–21 58.8% #26 1,756 0 1 1982 22–22 50.0% #78 1,697 0 2
22 1992 22–27 44.9% #57 1,741 0 1 1983 32–19 62.7% #43 1,791 0 4
23 1993 24–25 49.0% #53 1,669 0 1 1984 27–19 58.7% #37 1,787 0 5
24 1994 16–19 45.7% #81 1,686 0 1 1985 16–21 43.2% #91 1,666 0 5
25 1995 37–29 56.1% #21 1,768 0 1 1986 8–11 42.1% #102 1,654 0 5
26 1996 35–28 55.6% #15 1,861 0 2 1987 18–18 50.0% #73 1,679 0 5
27 1997 18–27 40.0% #78 1,738 0 2 1988 36–20 64.3% #25 1,767 0 6
28 1998 38–24 61.3% #19 1,809 0 4 1989 15–18 45.5% #117 1,649 0 6
29 1999 17–25 40.5% #88 1,653 0 4 1990 6–13 31.6% #188 1,587 0 6
30 2000 7–14 33.3% #104 1,573 0 4 1991 5–7 41.7% #205 1,610 0 6
31 2001 12–17 41.4% #127 1,563 0 4 1992 10–11 47.6% #166 1,619 0 6
32 2002 0–2 0.0% #438 1,531 0 4 1993 4–5 44.4% #298 1,583 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #792 1,576 0 6
34 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #765 1,571 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jan Siemerink John Fitzgerald
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 — — — — — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1990 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1981 8 9 17 47.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
21 1991 16 7 23 69.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 1982 6 5 11 54.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 6 4 10 60.0%
22 1992 10 12 22 45.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 7 16 56.3% 1983 13 7 20 65.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 5 3 8 62.5%
23 1993 11 13 24 45.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 1984 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 4 6 10 40.0%
24 1994 9 11 20 45.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% 1985 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 1995 20 12 32 62.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1996 14 14 28 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 12 8 20 60.0% 1987 10 10 20 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 1997 10 12 22 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1988 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 15 5 20 75.0%
28 1998 18 11 29 62.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 1989 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
29 1999 10 12 22 45.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1990 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
30 2000 2 8 10 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1991 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
31 2001 6 6 12 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1992 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 129 121 250 51.6% 29 50 79 36.7% 28 30 58 48.3% 75 61 136 55.1% — 92 97 189 48.7% 10 23 33 30.3% 87 64 151 57.6% 41 38 79 51.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jan Siemerink John Fitzgerald
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1471 103.0 — — — — — — +9 23.1% -1.46 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.26
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1524 126.5 — — — — +8 — +37 38.2% -0.65 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 99.7 +0.18
20 1990 1541 108.1 — — — — +36 — — 52.6% -0.05 1–0 — — +1.03 1981 1674 141.9 — — — — -72 -16 -14 50.8% +0.33 10–9 (53%) 9–11 (45%) 103.3 +0.46
21 1991 1757 143.1 +3.22 -0.58 1.074 51.5% +40 -248 -209 55.7% +0.44 11–10 (52%) 14–13 (52%) 103.1 -0.39 1982 1697 134.5 — — — — +13 -132 +11 52.3% +0.17 5–9 (36%) 9–6 (60%) 97.4 +1.60
22 1992 1741 139.7 +1.78 -2.28 0.929 49.2% +31 -264 -201 43.8% -0.47 7–7 (50%) 10–6 (63%) 101.1 -2.48 1983 1791 137.8 — — — — +37 -234 +1 59.1% +0.39 11–6 (65%) 17–9 (65%) 108.5 +0.37
23 1993 1669 136.6 +2.63 -1.58 1.020 50.4% +20 -120 -143 50.0% +0.11 8–11 (42%) 13–14 (48%) 93.9 +0.60 1984 1787 132.5 — — — — -28 — +73 53.8% +0.32 10–2 (83%) 9–13 (41%) 102.2 +1.73
24 1994 1686 139.2 +3.09 -0.26 1.054 50.9% -6 -131 — 48.8% +0.01 3–7 (30%) 8–8 (50%) 97.2 -1.29 1985 1667 139.5 — — — — +50 — +110 47.6% +0.03 8–12 (40%) 5–10 (33%) 92.2 -2.02
25 1995 1768 149.5 +3.33 -1.32 1.035 50.6% -12 -116 -191 54.4% +0.22 11–8 (58%) 12–7 (63%) 111.6 -2.79 1986 1655 121.0 — — — — +23 -156 +127 41.5% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 10–3 (77%) 107.1 +0.24
26 1996 1862 148.8 +2.53 -0.73 1.019 50.6% -13 -212 -147 54.0% +0.10 11–10 (52%) 30–16 (65%) 109.9 -1.35 1987 1680 134.1 — — — — +18 — +72 51.6% +0.11 3–8 (27%) 7–4 (64%) 97.5 +0.81
27 1997 1739 137.7 +1.77 -1.30 0.987 50.2% +24 -75 -78 43.8% -0.28 7–12 (37%) 12–13 (48%) 97.6 -0.14 1988 1768 135.8 — — — — -4 — +39 56.9% +0.40 15–3 (83%) 12–5 (71%) 114.7 +2.51
28 1998 1810 145.1 +3.80 -2.09 1.038 50.9% +13 -234 -13 57.3% +0.46 15–7 (68%) 14–16 (47%) 103.5 -0.24 1989 1649 123.1 — — — — -39 — +186 47.8% -0.26 5–6 (45%) 7–5 (58%) 97.6 +1.14
29 1999 1654 132.5 +1.25 -2.98 0.884 48.1% +56 -141 +72 42.6% -0.49 6–7 (46%) 7–9 (44%) 96.5 +0.21 1990 1587 122.0 — — — — +24 — +178 34.0% -1.00 5–4 (56%) 3–8 (27%) 99.6 -0.41
30 2000 1573 115.4 -0.13 -3.10 0.870 47.9% +66 -41 +96 37.0% -0.83 3–5 (38%) 4–2 (67%) 98.7 +0.50 1991 1610 118.4 — — — — -28 — +182 40.7% -0.74 1–1 0–2 — -0.77
31 2001 1564 122.8 +0.45 -4.28 0.859 47.7% +102 -52 +33 38.7% -0.73 6–4 (60%) 6–11 (35%) 101.1 -0.11 1992 1619 124.3 — — — — +19 — — 49.0% -0.18 2–2 (50%) 7–1 (88%) 103.9 +0.09
32 2002 1531 102.5 -1.57 -0.36 0.773 46.8% — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.01 1993 1583 106.1 — — — — +30 — — 42.3% -0.35 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — +0.97
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1577 99.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.23
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1571 104.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.21
Career — 1902 144.8 +2.44 -1.62 0.993 50.1% +20 -133 -71 49.5% -0.03 89–89 (50%) 131–118 (53%) 104.4 -1.24 — 1859 138.8 — — — — +2 -88 +60 50.0% +0.02 81–68 (54%) 101–82 (55%) 106.7 +1.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.