H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Jan Siemerink vs John Fitzgerald H2H: 0-2
John Fitzgerald holds a 2–0 lead over Jan Siemerink in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, John Fitzgerald leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, John Fitzgerald won the 1992 Australian Open second round 7-5 6-1 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 56
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 65
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 1992* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | John Fitzgerald | 7-5 6-1 7-6(4) | Jan Siemerink | Match data |
| Jan 2, 1992* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | John Fitzgerald | 6-2 7-6(3) | Jan Siemerink | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Siemerink | #987 | #14 | 1,863 | 1,908 | 261 | 260 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| John Fitzgerald | #765 | #25 | 321 | 1,857 | 230 | 221 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan Siemerink | John Fitzgerald | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #305 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #135 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #60 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1991 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #26 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1992 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #57 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #43 | 1,790 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1993 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #53 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #37 | 1,786 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1994 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #81 | 1,685 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #91 | 1,665 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1995 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #102 | 1,654 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1996 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #15 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #78 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,778 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1998 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #117 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1999 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #88 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #188 | 1,587 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2000 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #205 | 1,610 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2001 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #127 | 1,564 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #166 | 1,618 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,532 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #298 | 1,582 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #792 | 1,575 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,570 | 0 | 6 |