H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Jan Siemerink vs Jonathan Stark H2H: 0-2

Jonathan Stark holds a 2–0 lead over Jan Siemerink in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jonathan Stark leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jonathan Stark won the 1996 Long Island round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jan Siemerink
NED Age 56 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Jonathan Stark
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jonathan Stark #113 6-4 6-4 Jan Siemerink #20 Match data Aug 22, 1996* R32 Long Island World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Jonathan Stark #62 6-4 7-6(4) Jan Siemerink #42 Match data Oct 7, 1993* R32 Toulouse ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jan Siemerink #987 #14 1,863 1,902 261 262 49.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Jonathan Stark #829 #36 913 1,802 135 150 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jan Siemerink Jonathan Stark
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1988 0–1 0.0% #403 1,482 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #1007 1,476 0 0
20 1990 5–4 55.6% #135 1,541 0 0 1991 1–3 25.0% #243 1,466 0 0
21 1991 30–21 58.8% #26 1,756 0 1 1992 19–19 50.0% #85 1,632 0 0
22 1992 22–27 44.9% #57 1,741 0 1 1993 28–23 54.9% #38 1,760 0 1
23 1993 24–25 49.0% #53 1,669 0 1 1994 26–23 53.1% #65 1,701 0 1
24 1994 16–19 45.7% #81 1,686 0 1 1995 18–24 42.9% #100 1,635 0 1
25 1995 37–29 56.1% #21 1,768 0 1 1996 19–16 54.3% #68 1,729 0 2
26 1996 35–28 55.6% #15 1,861 0 2 1997 17–23 42.5% #96 1,645 0 2
27 1997 18–27 40.0% #78 1,738 0 2 1998 4–11 26.7% #266 1,576 0 2
28 1998 38–24 61.3% #19 1,809 0 4 1999 3–4 42.9% #300 1,587 0 2
29 1999 17–25 40.5% #88 1,653 0 4 2000 0–1 0.0% #512 1,575 0 2
30 2000 7–14 33.3% #104 1,573 0 4 2001 0–1 0.0% #809 1,556 0 2
31 2001 12–17 41.4% #127 1,563 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 2002 0–2 0.0% #438 1,531 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jan Siemerink Jonathan Stark
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1990 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 1991 16 7 23 69.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 1992 11 12 23 47.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 1992 10 12 22 45.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 7 16 56.3% 1993 16 15 31 51.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
23 1993 11 13 24 45.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 1994 19 15 34 55.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
24 1994 9 11 20 45.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% 1995 10 15 25 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 1995 20 12 32 62.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1996 10 12 22 45.5% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 5 1 6 83.3%
26 1996 14 14 28 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 12 8 20 60.0% 1997 12 16 28 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 1997 10 12 22 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1998 4 10 14 28.6% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1998 18 11 29 62.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 1999 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 1999 10 12 22 45.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2000 2 8 10 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2001 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2001 6 6 12 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 129 121 250 51.6% 29 50 79 36.7% 28 30 58 48.3% 75 61 136 55.1% — 84 101 185 45.4% 7 12 19 36.8% 21 22 43 48.8% 23 15 38 60.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 448/514 of Jan Siemerink's and 247/283 of Jonathan Stark's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jan Siemerink Jonathan Stark
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 2/4 9.5 4.5 55.3% 87.0% 61.2% 50.0% 43.8% 75.3% 38.3%
21 1991 48/51 7.0 5.1 52.3% 75.3% 53.3% 58.8% 44.6% 64.8% 37.8% 1992 32/38 7.8 3.4 57.8% 73.9% 51.2% 63.5% 43.7% 64.0% 35.2%
22 1992 42/49 6.2 4.2 54.6% 72.8% 50.4% 63.1% 36.0% 62.7% 34.7% 1993 43/51 7.9 4.1 59.6% 75.4% 51.9% 58.3% 41.6% 66.0% 37.0%
23 1993 41/49 6.4 4.0 56.6% 76.6% 50.8% 62.6% 44.2% 65.2% 35.5% 1994 44/49 8.4 3.4 59.4% 75.5% 53.5% 66.5% 42.5% 66.6% 34.6%
24 1994 34/35 6.1 4.0 60.1% 75.5% 50.2% 63.0% 40.6% 65.5% 36.4% 1995 36/42 8.4 3.6 59.8% 74.9% 48.1% 57.2% 31.2% 63.9% 34.0%
25 1995 61/66 5.4 3.4 59.5% 73.7% 53.2% 64.8% 37.0% 65.3% 35.9% 1996 33/35 9.8 2.7 61.8% 77.5% 50.3% 61.8% 48.9% 67.3% 36.6%
26 1996 61/63 6.5 5.1 55.7% 75.7% 51.2% 65.5% 39.7% 64.8% 35.9% 1997 40/40 12.0 4.4 58.1% 77.9% 47.2% 52.9% 35.1% 65.2% 36.1%
27 1997 38/45 7.7 5.0 56.5% 74.2% 52.0% 66.9% 45.4% 64.4% 35.1% 1998 10/15 9.7 3.9 57.8% 73.2% 42.6% 53.3% 50.2% 60.5% 31.6%
28 1998 48/62 8.3 4.6 58.0% 77.7% 52.2% 65.2% 43.2% 66.9% 34.3% 1999 5/7 7.8 5.6 56.3% 75.0% 54.9% 57.9% 37.3% 66.2% 34.1%
29 1999 30/42 5.9 5.1 55.5% 73.7% 50.1% 56.9% 38.4% 63.1% 32.6% 2000 1/1 3.0 4.0 57.4% 67.7% 47.8% 25.0% 0.0% 59.3% 27.6%
30 2000 17/21 6.5 5.8 54.9% 73.6% 46.0% 64.2% 28.0% 61.4% 33.6% 2001 1/1 11.0 5.0 58.7% 88.6% 54.8% 66.7% 20.0% 74.7% 24.7%
31 2001 26/29 7.2 5.9 52.8% 75.6% 48.7% 56.6% 34.2% 62.7% 32.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2002 2/2 7.0 6.0 54.2% 76.2% 50.9% 42.9% 50.0% 64.8% 27.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 448/523 6.6 4.6 56.3% 75.1% 51.3% 62.8% 40.0% 64.6% 35.2% — 247/285 9.0 3.7 59.2% 75.9% 50.3% 59.5% 40.5% 65.5% 35.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jan Siemerink Jonathan Stark
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1483 96.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.18
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1477 103.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.08
20 1990 1541 108.1 — — — — +36 — — 52.6% -0.05 1–0 — — +1.03 1991 1467 107.7 +1.68 +0.55 1.551 55.2% — — — 33.3% -0.44 0–1 — — +0.20
21 1991 1757 143.1 +3.22 -0.58 1.074 51.5% +40 -248 -209 55.7% +0.44 11–10 (52%) 14–13 (52%) — -0.39 1992 1632 131.9 +1.77 -1.58 0.977 49.8% +6 -134 +30 51.6% +0.04 5–7 (42%) 8–5 (62%) — +1.18
22 1992 1741 139.7 +1.78 -2.28 0.929 49.2% +31 -264 -201 43.8% -0.47 7–7 (50%) 10–6 (63%) — -2.48 1993 1761 148.8 +4.38 -0.55 1.088 51.2% +9 -195 -98 56.3% +0.48 5–9 (36%) 12–13 (48%) — -2.43
23 1993 1669 136.6 +2.63 -1.58 1.020 50.4% +20 -120 -143 50.0% +0.11 8–11 (42%) 13–14 (48%) — +0.60 1994 1701 136.5 +4.00 -2.92 1.035 50.6% +27 — -76 51.3% +0.12 4–6 (40%) 16–9 (64%) — +1.67
24 1994 1686 139.2 +3.09 -0.26 1.054 50.9% -6 -131 — 48.8% +0.01 3–7 (30%) 8–8 (50%) — -1.29 1995 1636 139.5 +1.82 -2.24 0.944 49.1% +35 -83 -8 41.0% -0.33 7–6 (54%) 8–10 (44%) — -1.07
25 1995 1768 149.5 +3.33 -1.32 1.035 50.6% -12 -116 -191 54.4% +0.22 11–8 (58%) 12–7 (63%) — -2.79 1996 1730 141.3 +3.90 -0.61 1.121 51.8% +1 — -41 55.1% +0.36 4–6 (40%) 8–10 (44%) — -0.71
26 1996 1862 148.8 +2.53 -0.73 1.019 50.6% -13 -212 -147 54.0% +0.10 11–10 (52%) 30–16 (65%) — -1.35 1997 1645 132.9 +2.38 -1.22 1.039 50.5% +18 -89 +39 45.8% -0.21 7–11 (39%) 16–13 (55%) — +0.04
27 1997 1739 137.7 +1.77 -1.30 0.987 50.2% +24 -75 -78 43.8% -0.28 7–12 (37%) 12–13 (48%) — -0.14 1998 1577 115.9 +0.36 -2.34 0.799 46.3% +3 — — 33.3% -0.91 1–4 (20%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.03
28 1998 1810 145.1 +3.80 -2.09 1.038 50.9% +13 -234 -13 57.3% +0.46 15–7 (68%) 14–16 (47%) — -0.24 1999 1588 117.9 +0.64 -0.69 1.011 49.8% +12 — +49 44.4% +0.44 2–2 (50%) 0–4 (0%) — -0.10
29 1999 1654 132.5 +1.25 -2.98 0.884 48.1% +56 -141 +72 42.6% -0.49 6–7 (46%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.21 2000 1575 100.2 -0.93 +0.34 0.677 42.9% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01
30 2000 1573 115.4 -0.13 -3.10 0.870 47.9% +66 -41 +96 37.0% -0.83 3–5 (38%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.50 2001 1557 100.1 -1.00 -0.03 0.974 49.3% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.20
31 2001 1564 122.8 +0.45 -4.28 0.859 47.7% +102 -52 +33 38.7% -0.73 6–4 (60%) 6–11 (35%) — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2002 1531 102.5 -1.57 -0.36 0.773 46.8% — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1902 144.8 +2.44 -1.62 0.993 50.1% +20 -133 -71 49.5% -0.03 89–89 (50%) 131–118 (53%) 104.4 -1.24 — 1802 142.5 +2.91 -1.53 1.024 50.3% +16 -133 -17 48.7% +0.02 35–54 (39%) 70–68 (51%) 97.2 -0.34

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.