H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jan Siemerink vs Jonathan Stark H2H: 0-2
Jonathan Stark holds a 2–0 lead over Jan Siemerink in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jonathan Stark leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jonathan Stark won the 1996 Long Island third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 56
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 1996* | Long Island | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jonathan Stark | 6-4 6-4 | Jan Siemerink | Match data |
| Oct 7, 1993* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jonathan Stark | 6-4 7-6(4) | Jan Siemerink | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Siemerink | #987 | #14 | 1,863 | 1,908 | 261 | 260 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Jonathan Stark | #829 | #36 | 913 | 1,801 | 135 | 150 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan Siemerink | Jonathan Stark | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1007 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #135 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #243 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #26 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #57 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #38 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1993 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #53 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1994 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #81 | 1,685 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1995 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #68 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1996 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #15 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #96 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #78 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #266 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1998 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #300 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1999 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #88 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #512 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2000 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,556 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2001 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #127 | 1,564 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,532 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |